Cited by 139

On the computational power of neural nets

Siegelmann, Hava T., Sontag, Eduardo D.·1992·Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/130385.130432

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recurrent NNs have a remarkable capacity for algorithmic learning and are Turing-complete.

    “recent work has shown a remarkable capacity for algorithmic learning with recurrent NNs [14] that are known to be Turing-complete [15].”

    From An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layer (2017) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. J. Berstel, C. Reutenauer, Rational Series and Their Languages, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.
  2. L, Blum, M. Shub, and S. Smale, "On a theory of computation and complexity over the real numbers: NP completeness, recursive functions, and univer- sal machines," Buii. A.M.S. 21(1989): 1-46:
  3. M. Garzon, S. Franklin, "Neural computability H," in Proc. .%d Int. Joint Conf. Neural Networks U 1989: I, 631-637. .
  4. L. iles, D. Chen, C.B. Miller, H.H. Chen, G.Z. Sun, Y.C. Lee, "Second-order recurrent neural net- works for grammatical inference," Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Net- works, Seattle, Washington, IEEE Publication, vol. 2 (1991): 273-278.
  5. R. Hartley, H. Szu, "A comparison of the compu- tational power of neural network models," in Proc. IEEE Conf. Neural Networks (1987 : III 17-22.
  6. J.E. Hopcroft, and J .D. Unman, ntro uction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, Addison-Wesley, 1979.
  7. S.C. Kleene, "Representation of events in nerve nets and finite automata,w in Shannon, C, E., and J. McCarthy, eds., Automata Studies, Princeton Univ. Press 1956: 3-41.
  8. W. Maass, G. Schnitger, E.D. Sontag, "On the computational power 'of" sigmoid versus boolean threshold circuits," Proc. of the M?nd Annual Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (1991): 767-776.
  9. w. . cCulloch, W. Pitts, "A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity," Bull. Math. Biophys. 5(1943): 115-133.
  10. M.L. Minsky, Computation: Finite and Infinite Machines, Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, 1967.
  11. J.B. Pollack, On Connectionist Models of Natu- ral Language Processing, Ph.D. Dissertation, Com- puter Science Dept, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, 1987.
  12. J.H. Reif, J.D. Tygar, A. Yoshida "The com- putability and complexity of optical beam tracing," Proc. of the 31st Annual Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science 1990: 106-114.
  13. R. Schwarzschild, ki .D. ontag, "Algebraic theory of sign-linear systems, " in Proceedings of the Au- tomatic Control Conference, Boston, MA, June Lk 1991:799-804. .
  14. E. hannon, "A universal turing machine with two internal states," in Shannon, C. E., and J. Mc- Carthy, eds., Automata Studies, Princeton Univ. Press 1956: 157-165.
  15. E.D. Sontag, Mathematical Control Theory: De- terministic Finite Dimensional Systems, Springer, New York, 1990.
  16. G.Z. Sun, H.H. Chen, Y.C. Lee, and C.L. Giles, "Turin~equivalence of neural networks with second order ~on~ection weights," Nets, Seattle, 1991:11,357-. in Int .Jt. Conf.Neural

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siegelmann, H. T., & Sontag, E. D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
  • Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
Venue
Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory
Publisher
ACM
Published
1992-07
Pages
440-449
Cited by
139
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review