The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reconciling environment integration and software evolution
Abstract
Common software design approaches complicate both tool integration and software evolution when applied in the development of integrated environments. We illustrate this by tracing the evolution of three different designs for a simple integrated environment as representative changes are made to the requirements. We present an approach that eases integration and evolution by preserving tool independence in the face of integration. We design tool integration relationships as separate components called mediators , and we design tools to implicitly invoke mediators that integrate them. Mediators separate tools from each other, while implicit invocation allows tools to remain independent of mediators. To enable the use of our approach on a range of platforms, we provide a formalized model and requirements for implicit invocation mechanisms. We apply this model both to analyze existing mechanisms and in the design of a mechanism for C++.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A component- and message-based architectural style for GUI software
Taylor, R. N., Medvidovic, N., Anderson, K. M., Whitehead, E. J., Robbins, J. E., Nies, K. A., Oreizy, P., & Dubrow, D. L. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.508313 · Cited by 325
Applications of AI in classical software engineering
Barenkamp, M., Rebstadt, J., & Thomas, O. (2020) · AI Perspectives · doi:10.1186/s42467-020-00005-4 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Sullivan, K. J., & Notkin, D.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-268
- ISSN
- 1049-331X (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7392
- OpenAlex
- W2149244483
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconciling environment integration and software evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/131736.131744
- The paper
- Sullivan, K. J., & Notkin, D. (1992). Reconciling environment integration and software evolution. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1145/131736.131744
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.