The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Web search personalization with ontological user profiles
Abstract
Every user has a distinct background and a specific goal when searching for information on the Web. The goal of Web search personalization is to tailor search results to a particular user based on that user's interests and preferences. Effective personalization of information access involves two important challenges: accurately identifying the user context and organizing the information in such a way that matches the particular context. We present an approach to personalized search that involves building models of user context as ontological profiles by assigning implicitly derived interest scores to existing concepts in a domain ontology. A spreading activation algorithm is used to maintain the interest scores based on the user's ongoing behavior. Our experiments show that re-ranking the search results based on the interest scores and the semantic evidence in an ontological user profile is effective in presenting the most relevant results to the user.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Haveliwala, T. H. (2002) · Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/511446.511513 · Cited by 1,567
Cited by
Context-Aware Recommender Systems
Adomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2011) · Recommender Systems Handbook · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_7 · Cited by 1,102
Athukorala, K., Hoggan, E., Lehtiö, A., Ruotsalo, T., & Jacucci, G. (2013) · Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/meet.14505001041 · Cited by 60
Group based Personalized Search by Integrating Search Behaviour and Friend Network
Zhou, Y., Dou, Z., Wei, B., Xie, R., & Wen, J.-R. (2021) · Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3404835.3462918 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Sieg, A., Mobasher, B., & Burke, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2007-11-06
- Pages
- 525-534
- OpenAlex
- W2145413874
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
