Cited by 127Speech Recognition and SynthesisNatural Language Processing TechniquesSpeech and dialogue systems

Morph-based speech recognition and modeling of out-of-vocabulary words across languages

Creutz, Mathias, Hirsimäki, Teemu, Kurimo, Mikko, Puurula, Antti, Pylkkönen, Janne, Siivola, Vesa, Varjokallio, Matti, Arisoy, Ebru +2 more·2007·ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing

Abstract

We explore the use of morph-based language models in large-vocabulary continuous-speech recognition systems across four so-called morphologically rich languages: Finnish, Estonian, Turkish, and Egyptian Colloquial Arabic. The morphs are subword units discovered in an unsupervised, data-driven way using the Morfessor algorithm. By estimating n -gram language models over sequences of morphs instead of words, the quality of the language model is improved through better vocabulary coverage and reduced data sparsity. Standard word models suffer from high out-of-vocabulary (OOV) rates, whereas the morph models can recognize previously unseen word forms by concatenating morphs. It is shown that the morph models do perform fairly well on OOVs without compromising the recognition accuracy on in-vocabulary words. The Arabic experiment constitutes the only exception since here the standard word model outperforms the morph model. Differences in the datasets and the amount of data are discussed as a plausible explanation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1322391.1322394

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 57 · Cited by 127

Authors
Creutz, M., Hirsimäki, T., Kurimo, M., Puurula, A., Pylkkönen, J., Siivola, V., Varjokallio, M., Arisoy, E., Saraçlar, M., & Stolcke, A.
Affiliations
  • Helsinki University of Technology, TKK, Finland
  • Boǧaziçi University, Istanbul
  • Boğaziçi University (TR)
  • International Computer Science Institute (US)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing
Published
2007-12
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
1-29
ISSN
  • 1550-4875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-4883
OpenAlex
W2032942114
Cited by
127
References
57
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
10.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing (publishedVersion)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (H0011-06-C-0023)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
out-of-vocabulary words, morphologically rich languages, continuous speech recognition, Morfessor, n-gram language models, vocabulary coverage, Finnish language, Estonian language, Turkish language, Egyptian Arabic, word models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review