The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A survey on model-based testing approaches: a systematic review
Abstract
This paper describes a systematic review performed on model-based testing (MBT) approaches. A selection criterion was used to narrow the initially identified four hundred and six papers to focus on seventy-eight papers. Detailed analysis of these papers shows where MBT approaches have been applied, the characteristics, and the limitations. The comparison criteria includes representation models, support tools, test coverage criteria, the level of automation, intermediate models, and the complexity. This paper defines and explains the review methodology and presents some results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A taxonomy of model‐based testing approaches
Utting, M., Pretschner, A., & Legeard, B. (2012) · Software Testing, Verification and Reliability · doi:10.1002/stvr.456 · Cited by 632
Guided, stochastic model-based GUI testing of Android apps
Su, T., Meng, G., Chen, Y., Wu, K., Yang, W., Yao, Y., Pu, G., Liu, Y., & Su, Z. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3106237.3106298 · Cited by 371
When and what to automate in software testing? A multi-vocal literature review
Garousi, V., & Mäntylä, M. V. (2016) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2016.04.015 · Cited by 182
Model-based testing for software safety: a systematic mapping study
Gurbuz, H. G., & Tekinerdogan, B. (2018) · Software Quality Journal · doi:10.1007/s11219-017-9386-2 · Cited by 78
“In Dias Neto et al. (2007), they perform a systematic review on model-based testing approaches.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Dias Neto, A. C., Subramanyan, R., Vieira, M., & Travassos, G. H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Empirical assessment of software engineering languages and technologies: held in conjunction with the 22nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) 2007
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2007-11-05
- Pages
- 31-36
- OpenAlex
- W2130422196
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey on model-based testing approaches: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1353673.1353681
- The paper
- Dias Neto, A. C., Subramanyan, R., Vieira, M., & Travassos, G. H. (2007). A survey on model-based testing approaches: a systematic review. Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Empirical assessment of software engineering languages and technologies: held in conjunction with the 22nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) 2007. https://doi.org/10.1145/1353673.1353681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
