The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Towards temporal web search
Abstract
This paper shifts the focus of Web search towards finding and exploiting small text nuggets, rather than full-length documents, assumming that the type of targeted information (e.g., date) is specified in the queries. Each nugget is a document sentence fragment that encodes open-domain factual information associated to some entity. The entities are dates (e.g., 1971) when the events captured by the nuggets must have occurred. The nuggets are extracted from the unstructured text of Web documents, based on lightweight text processing. Since per-document time stamps are available only in restricted collections such as news articles, but not in arbitrary Web documents, the extraction of the relevant dates relies on simple, local text analysis. The resulting time-stamped text nuggets have immediate applications in Web search, as direct results for queries asking about the date of an event explicitly (e.g., "When was the transistor invented") or implicitly (e.g., "Golden Gate Bridge built").
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pasca 2008 proposed a temporal question answering system which defines regular expressions to detect dates that meet certain requirements.
“[Pasca 2008] proposed a temporal question answering system which defines regular expressions to detect dates that meet certain requirements.”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Pasca 2008
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.3115/974147.974188 · DOI
- 10.3115/974147.974178 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/160688.160717 · DOI
- 10.1145/502115.502117 · DOI
- M. Maybury , editor. New Directions in Question Answering . MIT Press , Cambridge, Massachusetts , 2004 . M. Maybury, editor. New Directions in Question Answering. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2004.
- 10.1145/1321440.1321455 · DOI
- 10.1002/asi.v56:6 · DOI
- 10.3115/1073083.1073092 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications
Campos, R., Dias, G., Jorge, A. M., & Jatowt, A. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2619088 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Pasca, M.
- Affiliations
- Google Inc., Mountain View, California
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2008-03-16
- Pages
- 1117-1121
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review