The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feature weighting in content based recommendation system using social network analysis
Abstract
We propose a hybridization of collaborative filtering and content based recommendation system. Attributes used for content based recommendations are assigned weights depending on their importance to users. The weight values are estimated from a set of linear regression equations obtained from a social network graph which captures human judgment about similarity of items.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“it is also possible to use machine learning methods that can learn from population and individual user data to automatically adapt the form of interventions to meet the user’s needs and capabilities [25-27].”
From The Behavioral Intervention Technology Model: An Integrated Conceptual and Technological Framework for eHealth and mHealth Interventions (2014) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments
Burke, R. (2002) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1023/a:1021240730564 · Cited by 4,119
Content-boosted collaborative filtering for improved recommendations
Melville, P., Mooney, R. J., & Nagarajan, R. (2002) · doi:10.5555/777092.777124 · Cited by 1,104
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38sup-186 · Cited by 147
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mohr, D. C., Schueller, S. M., Montague, E., Burns, M. N., & Rashidi, P. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3077 · Cited by 510
Linked open data to support content-based recommender systems
Noia, T. D., Mirizzi, R., Ostuni, V. C., Romito, D., & Zanker, M. (2012) · International Conference on Semantic Systems · doi:10.1145/2362499.2362501 · Cited by 289
Enhancing Collaborative Filtering by User Interest Expansion via Personalized Ranking
Liu, Q., Chen, E., Xiong, H., Ding, C. H. Q., & Chen, J. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2011.2163711 · Cited by 187
Content-Based Movie Recommendation System Using Genre Correlation
Reddy, S., Nalluri, S., Kunisetti, S., Ashok, S., & Venkatesh, B. (2018) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1927-3_42 · Cited by 181
Content-based filtering for recommendation systems using multiattribute networks
Son, J., & Kim, S. B. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.08.008 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Debnath, S., Ganguly, N., & Mitra, P.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2008-04-21
- Pages
- 1041-1042
- OpenAlex
- W2096235681
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 9.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Data Mining
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Keywords
- content-based recommendation, collaborative filtering, hybrid recommendation, feature weighting, social network analysis, linear regression, item similarity, user preferences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review