The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Personalized information delivery: an analysis of information filtering methods
Open accessAbstract
With the increasing availability of information in electronic form, it becomes more important and feasible to have automatic methods to filter information.Research organizations generate large amounts of information, which can include departmental and technical memoranda, announcements of meetings and conferences, and minutes from meetings.This volume of information makes it difficult to keep employees apprised of all relevant work.Furthermore, only a small fraction of the available information will actually be relevant to any particular employee within an organization that covers a variety of areas.Thus, there is the problem of determining what information is of interest to the employee, while minimizing the amount of search through irrelevant information.This research tested several information-retrieval methods for filtering technical memos.Filtering of information is not a new concept, nor is it one that is limited to electronic documents.When we read standard paper texts, information filtering occurs.We only buy certain magazines, since other magazines may contain information that is redundant or irrelevant to our interests.In this way, we are filtering out some of the large amount of information to which we have access.Within any particular magazine, we also choose articles that appear relevant to our interests.Thus, when people are engaged in any sort of acquisition of information, they continually filter information.With the advent of electronic presentation of information, some of that filtering need no longer be done by us, but could be done automatically by the system that presents the information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews
Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., & Riedl, J. (1994) · Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '94 · doi:10.1145/192844.192905 · Cited by 5,058
An introduction to latent semantic analysis
Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539809545028 · Cited by 4,880
Self-citationContent-Based Recommendation Systems
Pazzani, M. J., & Billsus, D. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_10 · Cited by 2,600
Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis
Hofmann, T. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.6705 · Cited by 2,047
WebMate: a personal agent for browsing and searching
Chen, L., & Sycara, K. (1998) · Proceedings of the second international conference on Autonomous agents - AGENTS '98 · doi:10.1145/280765.280789 · Cited by 465
Metadata
- Authors
- Foltz, P. W., & Dumais, S. T.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 51-60
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2056029990
- Cited by
- 500
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personalized information delivery: an analysis of information filtering methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/138859.138866
- The paper
- Foltz, P. W., & Dumais, S. T. (1992). Personalized information delivery: an analysis of information filtering methods. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/138859.138866
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.