The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry
Open accessAbstract
Tapestry is an experimental mail system developed at the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.The motivation for Tapestry comes from the increasing use of electronic mail, which is resulting in users being inundated by a huge stream of incoming documents [2, 7, 12].One way to handle large volumes of mail is to provide mailing lists, enabling users to subscribe only to those lists of interest to them.However, as illustrated in Figure 1, the set of documents of interest to a particular user rarely map neatly to existing lists.A better solution is for a user to specify afi'lter that scans all lists, selecting interesting documents no matter what list they are in.Several mail systems support filtering based on a document's contents [3, 5, 6, 8].A basic tenet of the Tapestry work is that more effective filtering can be done by involving humans in the filtering process.In addition to content-based filtering, the Tapestry system was designed and built to support coUaborativefi'ltering. Collaborative filtering simply means that people collaborate to help one another perform filtering by recording their reactions to documents they read.Such reactions may be that a document was particularly interesting (or particularly uninteresting).These reactions, more generally called annotations, can be accessed by others' filters.One application of annotations is in support of moderated newsgroups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Structure and Function of Complex Networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2003) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450342480 · Cited by 18,719
Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372071 · Cited by 9,135
Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Terveen, L. G., & Riedl, J. T. (2004) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/963770.963772 · Cited by 5,798
GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews
Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., & Riedl, J. (1994) · Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '94 · doi:10.1145/192844.192905 · Cited by 5,058
Resnick, P., & Varian, H. R. (1997) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/245108.245121 · Cited by 3,772
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldberg, D., Nichols, D., Oki, B. M., & Terry, D.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 61-70
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W1966553486
- Cited by
- 4,066
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 64.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/138859.138867
- The paper
- Goldberg, D., Nichols, D., Oki, B. M., & Terry, D. (1992). Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/138859.138867
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.