The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian probabilistic matrix factorization using Markov chain Monte Carlo
Abstract
Low-rank matrix approximation methods provide one of the simplest and most effective approaches to collaborative filtering. Such models are usually fitted to data by finding a MAP estimate of the model parameters, a procedure that can be performed efficiently even on very large datasets. However, unless the regularization parameters are tuned carefully, this approach is prone to overfitting because it finds a single point estimate of the parameters. In this paper we present a fully Bayesian treatment of the Probabilistic Matrix Factorization (PMF) model in which model capacity is controlled automatically by integrating over all model parameters and hyperparameters. We show that Bayesian PMF models can be efficiently trained using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods by applying them to the Netflix dataset, which consists of over 100 million movie ratings. The resulting models achieve significantly higher prediction accuracy than PMF models trained using MAP estimation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to Variational Methods for Graphical Models
Jordan, M. I., Ghahramani, Z., Jaakkola, T. S., & Saul, L. K. (1999) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007665907178 · Cited by 3,791
Keeping the neural networks simple by minimizing the description length of the weights
Hinton, G. E., & van Camp, D. (1993) · Proceedings of the sixth annual conference on Computational learning theory - COLT '93 · doi:10.1145/168304.168306 · Cited by 994
Cited by
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Rendle, S. (2010) · 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm.2010.127 · Cited by 3,189
A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges
Abdar, M., Pourpanah, F., Hussain, S., Rezazadegan, D., Liu, L., Ghavamzadeh, M., Fieguth, P., Cao, X., Khosravi, A., Acharya, U. R., et al. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 · Cited by 3,111
“[66] used MCMC to approximate the predictive distribution rating values of the movies.”
MethodBayesian CP Factorization of Incomplete Tensors with Automatic Rank Determination
Zhao, Q., Zhang, L., & Cichocki, A. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2392756 · Cited by 587
A Hybrid Collaborative Filtering Model with Deep Structure for Recommender Systems
Dong, X., Yu, L., Wu, Z., Sun, Y., Yuan, L., & Zhang, F. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10747 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Salakhutdinov, R., & Mnih, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 880-887
- OpenAlex
- W2085040216
- Cited by
- 1,413
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian probabilistic matrix factorization using Markov chain Monte Carlo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1390156.1390267
- The paper
- Salakhutdinov, R., & Mnih, A. (2008). Bayesian probabilistic matrix factorization using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08. https://doi.org/10.1145/1390156.1390267
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.