The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Query dependent ranking using K-nearest neighbor
Abstract
Many ranking models have been proposed in information retrieval, and recently machine learning techniques have also been applied to ranking model construction. Most of the existing methods do not take into consideration the fact that significant differences exist between queries, and only resort to a single function in ranking of documents. In this paper, we argue that it is necessary to employ different ranking models for different queries and onduct what we call query-dependent ranking. As the first such attempt, we propose a K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) method for query-dependent ranking. We first consider an online method which creates a ranking model for a given query by using the labeled neighbors of the query in the query feature space and then rank the documents with respect to the query using the created model. Next, we give two offline approximations of the method, which create the ranking models in advance to enhance the efficiency of ranking. And we prove a theory which indicates that the approximations are accurate in terms of difference in loss of prediction, if the learning algorithm used is stable with respect to minor changes in training examples. Our experimental results show that the proposed online and offline methods both outperform the baseline method of using a single ranking function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques
Järvelin, K., & Kekäläinen, J. (2002) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/582415.582418 · Cited by 4,841
Learning to rank using gradient descent
Burges, C., Shaked, T., Renshaw, E., Lazier, A., Deeds, M., Hamilton, N., & Hullender, G. (2005) · Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning - ICML '05 · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102363 · Cited by 2,836
Learning to rank: from pairwise approach to listwise approach
Cao, Z., Qin, T., Liu, T.-Y., Tsai, M.-F., & Li, H. (2007) · Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning · doi:10.1145/1273496.1273513 · Cited by 1,960
Self-citationA language modeling approach to information retrieval
Ponte, J. M., & Croft, W. B. (1998) · Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/290941.291008 · Cited by 1,821
Cited by
Effects of Distance Measure Choice on K-Nearest Neighbor Classifier Performance: A Review
Abu Alfeilat, H. A., Hassanat, A. B. A., Lasassmeh, O., Tarawneh, A. S., Alhasanat, M. B., Eyal Salman, H. S., & Prasath, V. B. S. (2019) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2018.0175 · Cited by 667
LETOR: A benchmark collection for research on learning to rank for information retrieval
Qin, T., Liu, T.-Y., Xu, J., & Li, H. (2010) · Information Retrieval · doi:10.1007/s10791-009-9123-y · Cited by 461
Self-citationFine-Grained Visual Comparisons with Local Learning
Yu, A., & Grauman, K. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.32 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- Geng, X., Liu, T.-Y., Qin, T., Arnold, A., Li, H., & Shum, H.-Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2008-07-20
- Pages
- 115-122
- OpenAlex
- W2110822809
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.79
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Query dependent ranking using K-nearest neighbor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1390334.1390356
- The paper
- Geng, X., Liu, T.-Y., Qin, T., Arnold, A., Li, H., & Shum, H.-Y. (2008). Query dependent ranking using K-nearest neighbor. Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1145/1390334.1390356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.