Land cover change detection: a case study
Abstract
The study of land cover change is an important problem in the Earth Science domain because of its impacts on local climate, radiation balance, biogeochemistry, hydrology, and the diversity and abundance of terrestrial species. Most well-known change detection techniques from statistics, signal processing and control theory are not well-suited for the massive high-dimensional spatio-temporal data sets from Earth Science due to limitations such as high computational complexity and the inability to take advantage of seasonality and spatio-temporal autocorrelation inherent in Earth Science data. In our work, we seek to address these challenges with new change detection techniques that are based on data mining approaches. Specifically, in this paper we have performed a case study for a new change detection technique for the land cover change detection problem. We study land cover change in the state of California, focusing on the San Francisco Bay Area and perform an extended study on the entire state. We also perform a comparative evaluation on forests in the entire state. These results demonstrate the utility of data mining techniques for the land cover change detection problem.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Manual, on-the-ground observation can be accelerated by annotation of remote sensing data.
“This has traditionally been done via manual, on-the-ground observation, but the process can be accelerated by annotation of remote sensing data [91,92,513,637] (see also Section 6.1).”
From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [91]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Boriah, S., Kumar, V., Steinbach, M., Potter, C., & Klooster, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Ames Research Center (US)
- California State University, Monterey Bay (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2008-08-24
- Pages
- 857-865
- OpenAlex
- W2052782966
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- University of Minnesota
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Remote Sensing and Land Use
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
- Keywords
- land cover change detection, spatio-temporal data mining, spatiotemporal autocorrelation, seasonal variation, forest change detection, California, San Francisco Bay Area
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review