Cited by 43Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationRemote Sensing and Land UseRemote Sensing in Agriculture

Land cover change detection: a case study

Boriah, Shyam, Kumar, Vipin, Steinbach, Michael, Potter, Christopher, Klooster, Steven·2008·Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining

Abstract

The study of land cover change is an important problem in the Earth Science domain because of its impacts on local climate, radiation balance, biogeochemistry, hydrology, and the diversity and abundance of terrestrial species. Most well-known change detection techniques from statistics, signal processing and control theory are not well-suited for the massive high-dimensional spatio-temporal data sets from Earth Science due to limitations such as high computational complexity and the inability to take advantage of seasonality and spatio-temporal autocorrelation inherent in Earth Science data. In our work, we seek to address these challenges with new change detection techniques that are based on data mining approaches. Specifically, in this paper we have performed a case study for a new change detection technique for the land cover change detection problem. We study land cover change in the state of California, focusing on the San Francisco Bay Area and perform an extended study on the entire state. We also perform a comparative evaluation on forests in the entire state. These results demonstrate the utility of data mining techniques for the land cover change detection problem.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1401890.1401993

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manual, on-the-ground observation can be accelerated by annotation of remote sensing data.

    “This has traditionally been done via manual, on-the-ground observation, but the process can be accelerated by annotation of remote sensing data [91,92,513,637] (see also Section 6.1).”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [91]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 43

Authors
Boriah, S., Kumar, V., Steinbach, M., Potter, C., & Klooster, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
  • California State University, Monterey Bay (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2008-08-24
Pages
857-865
OpenAlex
W2052782966
Cited by
43
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • University of Minnesota
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Remote Sensing and Land Use
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Keywords
land cover change detection, spatio-temporal data mining, spatiotemporal autocorrelation, seasonal variation, forest change detection, California, San Francisco Bay Area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review