Cited by 1,132Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsData Management and Algorithms

Understanding mobility based on GPS data

Zheng, Yu, Li, Quannan, Chen, Yukun, Xie, Xing, Ma, Wei-Ying·2008·Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing

Abstract

Both recognizing human behavior and understanding a user's mobility from sensor data are critical issues in ubiquitous computing systems. As a kind of user behavior, the transportation modes, such as walking, driving, etc., that a user takes, can enrich the user's mobility with informative knowledge and provide pervasive computing systems with more context information. In this paper, we propose an approach based on supervised learning to infer people's motion modes from their GPS logs. The contribution of this work lies in the following two aspects. On one hand, we identify a set of sophisticated features, which are more robust to traffic condition than those other researchers ever used. On the other hand, we propose a graph-based post-processing algorithm to further improve the inference performance. This algorithm considers both the commonsense constraint of real world and typical user behavior based on location in a probabilistic manner. Using the GPS logs collected by 65 people over a period of 10 months, we evaluated our approach via a set of experiments. As a result, based on the change point-based segmentation method and Decision Tree-based inference model, the new features brought an eight percent improvement in inference accuracy over previous result, and the graph-based post-processing achieve a further four percent enhancement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1409635.1409677

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, Y., Li, Q., Chen, Y., Xie, X., & Ma, W.-Y.
Affiliations
Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing
Publisher
ACM
Published
2008-09-21
Pages
312-321
OpenAlex
W2136317921
Cited by
1,132
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 48
FWCI
76.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Data Management and Algorithms
Keywords
transportation mode recognition, human behavior recognition, supervised learning, feature engineering, decision tree, ubiquitous computing, context awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review