The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On fast and accurate detection of unauthorized wireless access points using clock skews
Abstract
We explore the use of clock skew of a wireless local area network access point (AP) as its fingerprint to detect unauthorized APs quickly and accurately. The main goal behind using clock skews is to overcome one of the major limitations of existing solutions - the inability to effectively detect Medium Access Control (MAC) address spoofing. We calculate the clock skew of an AP from the IEEE 802.11 Time Synchronization Function (TSF) timestamps sent out in the beacon/probe response frames. We use two different methods for this purpose - one based on linear programming and the other based on least square fit. We supplement these methods with a heuristic for differentiating original packets from those sent by the fake APs. We collect TSF timestamp data from several APs in two different residential settings. Using our measurement data as well as data obtained from a large conference setting, we find that clock skews remain consistent over time for the same AP but vary significantly across APs. Furthermore, we improve the resolution of received timestamp of the frames and show that with this enhancement our methodology can find clock skews very quickly, using 50-100 packets in most of the cases. We also discuss and quantify the impact of various external factors including temperature variation, virtualization, and NTP synchronization on clock skews. Our results indicate that the use of clock skews appears to be an efficient and robust method for detecting fake APs in wireless local area networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
IoT SENTINEL: Automated Device-Type Identification for Security Enforcement in IoT
Miettinen, M., Marchal, S., Hafeez, I., Asokan, N., Sadeghi, A.-R., & Tarkoma, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) · doi:10.1109/icdcs.2017.283 · Cited by 666
Precise Power Delay Profiling with Commodity WiFi
Xie, Y., Li, Z., & Li, M. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking · doi:10.1145/2789168.2790124 · Cited by 600
Precise Power Delay Profiling with Commodity Wi-Fi
Xie, Y., Li, Z., & Li, M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2018.2860991 · Cited by 282
S2M: A Lightweight Acoustic Fingerprints-Based Wireless Device Authentication Protocol
Chen, D., Zhang, N., Qin, Z., Mao, X., Qin, Z., Shen, X., & Li, X.-Y. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2016.2619679 · Cited by 164
A Novel Approach for Rogue Access Point Detection on the Client-Side
Nikbakhsh, S., Manaf, A. B. A., Zamani, M., & Janbeglou, M. (2012) · 2012 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops · doi:10.1109/waina.2012.108 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Jana, S., & Kasera, S. K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Mobile computing and networking
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2008-09-14
- Pages
- 104-115
- OpenAlex
- W2151043249
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On fast and accurate detection of unauthorized wireless access points using clock skews. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1409944.1409958
- The paper
- Jana, S., & Kasera, S. K. (2008). On fast and accurate detection of unauthorized wireless access points using clock skews. Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Mobile computing and networking. https://doi.org/10.1145/1409944.1409958
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.