The PARSEC benchmark suite: characterization and architectural implications
Abstract
This paper presents and characterizes the Princeton Application Repository for Shared-Memory Computers (PARSEC), a benchmark suite for studies of Chip-Multiprocessors (CMPs). Previous available benchmarks for multiprocessors have focused on high-performance computing applications and used a limited number of synchronization methods. PARSEC includes emerging applications in recognition, mining and synthesis (RMS) as well as systems applications which mimic large-scale multithreaded commercial programs. Our characterization shows that the benchmark suite covers a wide spectrum of working sets, locality, data sharing, synchronization and off-chip traffic. The benchmark suite has been made available to the public.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
The pricing of options and corporate liabilities
Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260062 · Cited by 29,074 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Williams, S., Waterman, A., & Patterson, D. A. (2009) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1498765.1498785 · Cited by 2,484 · see citing works
The ManyBugs and IntroClass benchmarks for automated repair of C programs
Le Goues, C., Holtschulte, N., Smith, E. K., Brun, Y., Devanbu, P., Forrest, S., & Weimer, W. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2015.2454513 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
A machine learning approach to live migration modeling
Jo, C., Cho, Y., & Egger, B. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Symposium on Cloud Computing · doi:10.1145/3127479.3129262 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
CAVBench: A Benchmark Suite for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles
Wang, Y., Liu, S., Wu, X., & Shi, W. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/ACM Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC) · doi:10.1109/sec.2018.00010 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
iMLBench: A Machine Learning Benchmark Suite for CPU-GPU Integrated Architectures
Zhang, C., Zhang, F., Guo, X., He, B., Zhang, X., & Du, X. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2020.3046870 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Workload-Aware Runtime Energy Management for HPC Systems
Reddy Basireddy, K., Wachter, E. W., Al-Hashimi, B. M., & Merrett, G. (2018) · 2018 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS) · doi:10.1109/hpcs.2018.00057 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bienia, C., Kumar, S., Singh, J. P., & Li, K.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Intel (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Parallel architectures and compilation techniques
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2008-10-25
- Pages
- 72-81
- ISSN
- 1089-795X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169875292
- Cited by
- 3,444
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 135 · 2020: 215 · 2019: 227 · 2018: 253 · 2017: 271 · 2016: 330 · 2015: 309 · 2014: 282 · 2013: 275 · 2012: 228
- FWCI
- 109.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Interconnection Networks and Systems
- Keywords
- multi-core processors, shared-memory multiprocessors, synchronization methods, working set, locality, data sharing, multithreaded programs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review