The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SystemCoDesigner—an automatic ESL synthesis approach by design space exploration and behavioral synthesis for streaming applications
Abstract
With increasing design complexity, the gap from ESL (Electronic System Level) design to RTL synthesis becomes more and more crucial to many industrial projects. Although several behavioral synthesis tools exist to automatically generate synthesizable RTL code from C/C++/SystemC-based input descriptions and software generation for embedded processors is automated as well, an efficient ESL synthesis methodology combining both is still missing. This article presents SystemCoDesigner, a novel SystemC-based ESL tool to automatically optimize a hardware/software SoC (System on Chip) implementation with respect to several objectives. Starting from a SystemC behavioral model, SystemCoDesigner automatically extracts the mathematical model, performs a behavioral synthesis step, and explores the multiobjective design space using state-of-the-art multiobjective optimization algorithms. During design space exploration, a single design point is evaluated by simulating highly accurate performance models, which are automatically generated from the SystemC behavioral model and the behavioral synthesis results. Moreover, SystemCoDesigner permits the automatic generation of bit streams for FPGA targets from any previously optimized SoC implementation. Thus SystemCoDesigner is the first fully automated ESL synthesis tool providing a correct-by-construction generation of hardware/software SoC implementations. As a case study, a model of a Motion-JPEG decoder was automatically optimized and implemented using SystemCoDesigner. Several synthesized SoC variants based on this model show different tradeoffs between required hardware costs and achieved system throughput, ranging from software-only solutions to pure hardware implementations that reach real-time performance for QCIF streams on a 50MHz FPGA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Online optimization for scheduling preemptable tasks on IaaS cloud systems
Li, J., Qiu, M., Ming, Z., Quan, G., Qin, X., & Gu, Z. (2012) · Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2012.02.002 · Cited by 375
Hardware/Software Codesign: The Past, the Present, and Predicting the Future
Teich, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2011.2182009 · Cited by 313
Self-citationElectronic System-Level Synthesis Methodologies
Gerstlauer, A., Haubelt, C., Pimentel, A. D., Stefanov, T. P., Gajski, D. D., & Teich, J. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2009.2026356 · Cited by 177
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Keinert, J., Streubūhr, M., Schlichter, T., Falk, J., Gladigau, J., Haubelt, C., Teich, J., & Meredith, M.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-23
- ISSN
- 1084-4309 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7309
- OpenAlex
- W2064115172
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 42.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SystemCoDesigner—an automatic ESL synthesis approach by design space exploration and behavioral synthesis for streaming applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1455229.1455230
- The paper
- Keinert, J., Streubūhr, M., Schlichter, T., Falk, J., Gladigau, J., Haubelt, C., Teich, J., & Meredith, M. (2009). SystemCoDesigner—an automatic ESL synthesis approach by design space exploration and behavioral synthesis for streaming applications. ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1455229.1455230
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.