The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scalable and efficient provable data possession
Abstract
Storage outsourcing is a rising trend which prompts a number of interesting security issues, many of which have been extensively investigated in the past. However, Provable Data Possession (PDP) is a topic that has only recently appeared in the research literature. The main issue is how to frequently, efficiently and securely verify that a storage server is faithfully storing its client's (potentially very large) outsourced data. The storage server is assumed to be untrusted in terms of both security and reliability. (In other words, it might maliciously or accidentally erase hosted data; it might also relegate it to slow or off-line storage.) The problem is exacerbated by the client being a small computing device with limited resources. Prior work has addressed this problem using either public key cryptography or requiring the client to outsource its data in encrypted form.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An Efficient and Secure Dynamic Auditing Protocol for Data Storage in Cloud Computing
Yang, K., & Jia, X. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2012.278 · Cited by 632
Security issues in cloud environments: a survey
Fernandes, D. A. B., Soares, L. F. B., Gomes, J. V., Freire, M. M., & Inácio, P. R. M. (2014) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-013-0208-7 · Cited by 494
Blockchain based Efficient and Robust Fair Payment for Outsourcing Services in Cloud Computing
Zhang, Y., Deng, R. H., Liu, X., & Zheng, D. (2018) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2018.06.018 · Cited by 228
Decentralized big data auditing for smart city environments leveraging blockchain technology
Yu, H., Yang, Z., & Sinnott, R. O. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2888940 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Ateniese, G., Di Pietro, R., Mancini, L. V., & Tsudik, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Security and privacy in communication netowrks
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2008-09-22
- Pages
- 1-10
- OpenAlex
- W2040193872
- Cited by
- 1,129
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scalable and efficient provable data possession. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1460877.1460889
- The paper
- Ateniese, G., Di Pietro, R., Mancini, L. V., & Tsudik, G. (2008). Scalable and efficient provable data possession. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Security and privacy in communication netowrks. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460877.1460889
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
