Cited by 88Anomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsData Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsAdvanced Database Systems and Queries

Detecting outlying properties of exceptional objects

Angiulli, Fabrizio, Fassetti, Fabio, Palopoli, Luigi·2009·ACM Transactions on Database Systems

Abstract

Assume you are given a data population characterized by a certain number of attributes. Assume, moreover, you are provided with the information that one of the individuals in this data population is abnormal, but no reason whatsoever is given to you as to why this particular individual is to be considered abnormal. In several cases, you will be indeed interested in discovering such reasons. This article is precisely concerned with this problem of discovering sets of attributes that account for the (a priori stated) abnormality of an individual within a given dataset. A criterion is presented to measure the abnormality of combinations of attribute values featured by the given abnormal individual with respect to the reference population. In this respect, each subset of attributes is intended to somehow represent a “property” of individuals. We distinguish between global and local properties. Global properties are subsets of attributes explaining the given abnormality with respect to the entire data population. With local ones, instead, two subsets of attributes are singled out, where the former one justifies the abnormality within the data subpopulation selected using the values taken by the exceptional individual on those attributes included in the latter one. The problem of individuating abnormal properties with associated explanations is formally stated and analyzed. Such a formal characterization is then exploited in order to devise efficient algorithms for detecting both global and local forms of most abnormal properties. The experimental evidence, which is accounted for in the article, shows that the algorithms are both able to mine meaningful information and to accomplish the computational task by examining a negligible fraction of the search space.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1508857.1508864

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 88

Authors
Angiulli, F., Fassetti, F., & Palopoli, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Calabria (IT)
  • Institute for High Performance Computing and Networking (IT)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Database Systems
Published
2009-04
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
1-62
ISSN
  • 0362-5915 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-4644
OpenAlex
W1991758224
Cited by
88
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Database Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Archive of Doctoral Theses and Digital Collections (University of Calabria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Database Systems and Queries
Keywords
outlier detection, search space reduction, data mining algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review