Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,266Advanced Software Engineering MethodologiesSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesDistributed systems and fault tolerance

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 157 of the 158 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-adaptive software: Landscape and research challenges

Salehie, Mazeiar, Tahvildari, Ladan·2009·ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems

Abstract

Software systems dealing with distributed applications in changing environments normally require human supervision to continue operation in all conditions. These (re-)configuring, troubleshooting, and in general maintenance tasks lead to costly and time-consuming procedures during the operating phase. These problems are primarily due to the open-loop structure often followed in software development. Therefore, there is a high demand for management complexity reduction, management automation, robustness, and achieving all of the desired quality requirements within a reasonable cost and time range during operation. Self-adaptive software is a response to these demands; it is a closed-loop system with a feedback loop aiming to adjust itself to changes during its operation. These changes may stem from the software system'sself(internal causes, e.g., failure) orcontext(external events, e.g., increasing requests from users). Such a system is required tomonitoritself and its context,detectsignificant changes,decidehow to react, andactto execute such decisions. These processes depend on adaptation properties (called self-* properties), domain characteristics (context information or models), and preferences of stakeholders. Noting these requirements, it is widely believed that new models and frameworks are needed to design self-adaptive software. This survey article presents a taxonomy, based on concerns of adaptation, that is,how,what,whenandwhere, towards providing a unified view of…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1516533.1516538

Cites

157 of 157 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 158 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.5555/1756301.1756316 · doi:10.5555/1756301.1756316
  2. Buschmann F. Meunier R. Rohnert H. Sommerlad P. and Stal M. 1996. A System of Patterns—Pattern Oriented Software Architecture. Wiley. Buschmann F. Meunier R. Rohnert H. Sommerlad P. and Stal M. 1996. A System of Patterns—Pattern Oriented Software Architecture. Wiley.
  3. Ibm ref. arch . 2005 . An architectural blueprint for autonomic computing. IBM white paper. http://www-03.ibm.com/autonomic/pdfs/ACBlueprintWhitePaperV7.pdf. Ibm ref. arch. 2005. An architectural blueprint for autonomic computing. IBM white paper. http://www-03.ibm.com/autonomic/pdfs/ACBlueprintWhitePaperV7.pdf.
  4. Ieee-iso/iec 14764. 2006. Standard for software maintenance - IEEE 14764-2006 - ISO/IEC 14764. URL = http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/11168/35960/01703974.pdf. Ieee-iso/iec 14764. 2006. Standard for software maintenance - IEEE 14764-2006 - ISO/IEC 14764. URL = http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/11168/35960/01703974.pdf.
  5. Iso /Iec 9126-1. 2001. ISO/IEC 9126-1 Standard : Software Eng. -Product quality - Part 1: Quality model , International Standard Organization , 2001 . Iso/Iec 9126-1. 2001. ISO/IEC 9126-1 Standard: Software Eng. -Product quality - Part 1: Quality model, International Standard Organization, 2001.
  6. 10.5555/375094.375105 · doi:10.5555/375094.375105
  7. Laddaga , R. , Robertson , P. , and Shrobe , H. E . 2001 . Results of the 2nd International workshop on self-adaptive software. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Self-Adaptive Software. 281--290 . Laddaga, R., Robertson, P., and Shrobe, H. E. 2001. Results of the 2nd International workshop on self-adaptive software. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Self-Adaptive Software. 281--290.
  8. 10.5555/646195.681473 · doi:10.5555/646195.681473
  9. Murch , R. 2004. Autonomic Computing . Prentice Hall . Murch, R. 2004. Autonomic Computing. Prentice Hall.
  10. 10.5555/2167575.2167592 · doi:10.5555/2167575.2167592
  11. 10.1145/214956.214961 · DOI
  12. 10.5555/977400.977958 · doi:10.5555/977400.977958
  13. Scott , J. , Neema , S. , Bapty , T. , and Abbott , B . 2000 . Hardware/ software runtime environment for dynamically reconfigurable systems. Tech. Rep. ISIS-2000-06, Vanderbilt Univ. Scott, J., Neema, S., Bapty, T., and Abbott, B. 2000. Hardware/software runtime environment for dynamically reconfigurable systems. Tech. Rep. ISIS-2000-06, Vanderbilt Univ.
  14. Serugendo , G. D. M. , Foukia , N. , Hassas , S. , Karageorgos , A. , Mostéfaoui , S. K. , Rana , O. F. , Ulieru , M. , Valckenaers , P. , and van Aart , C. 2003 . Self-organisation: Paradigms and app . In Proceedings of the Engineering Self-Organising Applications Workshop. 1--19 . Serugendo, G. D. M., Foukia, N., Hassas, S., Karageorgos, A., Mostéfaoui, S. K., Rana, O. F., Ulieru, M., Valckenaers, P., and van Aart, C. 2003. Self-organisation: Paradigms and app. In Proceedings of the Engineering Self-Organising Applications Workshop. 1--19.
  15. 10.5555/1018409.1018780 · doi:10.5555/1018409.1018780

Cited by

Items 501–600 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Salehie, M., & Tahvildari, L.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems
Published
2009-05
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
1-42
ISSN
  • 1556-4665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4703
OpenAlex
W1964137226
Cited by
1,266
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 99 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 119 · 2013: 105 · 2012: 110
FWCI
96.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
Keywords
self-adaptive software, self-* properties, distributed applications, context-aware systems, self-monitoring, self-configuration, self-healing, self-optimization, self-protection, research landscape, research gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.