Three environmental discourses in human-computer interaction
Abstract
A review of the past decade of human-computer interaction relating to environmental issues identifies three discourses whose commitments and assumptions have consequences for the design of new interfaces and interactive systems: sustainable interaction design, re-visioning consumption and citizen sensing. It suggests two promising directions for future research: participatory design and infrastructure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
User-centered design, HCI, UX, human factors, and related fields have arisen as responses to the challenge of understanding users across a wide range of product and tool design contexts.
“User-centered design (UCD), human-computer interaction (HCI), user experience (UX), human factors, and related fields have arisen as responses to this challenge across a wide range of product and tool design contexts [42,43,103].”
From Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty (2021) · cites this paper as [42]
Research to uncover user goals, needs, and constraints can involve a wide spectrum of methods, including in-depth interviews, contextual inquiry, diary studies, card sorting studies, user tests, user journey mapping, and jobs-to-be-done workshops with users.
“Research to uncover user goals, needs, and constraints can involve a wide spectrum of methods, including but not limited to in-depth interviews, contextual inquiry, diary studies, card sorting studies, user tests, user journey mapping, and jobs-to-be-done workshops with users [42,43,110].”
From Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty (2021) · cites this paper as [42]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty
Bhatt, U., Antorán, J., Zhang, Y., Liao, Q. V., Sattigeri, P., Fogliato, R., Melançon, G., Krishnan, R., Stanley, J., Tickoo, O., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462571 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
A Decade of Sustainable HCI: Connecting SHCI to the Sustainable Development Goals
Hansson, L. Å. E. J., Cerratto Pargman, T., & Pargman, D. S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445069 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Implementing Smart Urban Metabolism in the Stockholm Royal Seaport: Smart City SRS
Shahrokni, H., Årman, L., Lazarevic, D., Nilsson, A., & Brandt, N. (2015) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12308 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
- Authors
- Goodman, E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Goodman, Elizabeth
- ORCID
- Goodman, Elizabeth
- Venue
- CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-04-04
- Pages
- 2535-2544
- OpenAlex
- W2135287089
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.82
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
- Keywords
- sustainable interaction design, consumption, citizen sensing, participatory design, infrastructure, environmental discourse, interface design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
