The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Video SnapCut: robust video object cutout using localized classifiers
Abstract
Although tremendous success has been achieved for interactive object cutout in still images, accurately extracting dynamic objects in video remains a very challenging problem. Previous video cutout systems present two major limitations: (1) reliance on global statistics, thus lacking the ability to deal with complex and diverse scenes; and (2) treating segmentation as a global optimization, thus lacking a practical workflow that can guarantee the convergence of the systems to the desired results. We present Video SnapCut , a robust video object cutout system that significantly advances the state-of-the-art. In our system segmentation is achieved by the collaboration of a set of local classifiers, each adaptively integrating multiple local image features. We show how this segmentation paradigm naturally supports local user editing and propagates them across time. The object cutout system is completed with a novel coherent video matting technique. A comprehensive evaluation and comparison is presented, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed system at achieving high quality results, as well as the robustness of the system against various types of inputs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts
Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., & Zabih, R. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.969114 · Cited by 6,988
A Geodesic Framework for Fast Interactive Image and Video Segmentation and Matting
Bai, X., & Sapiro, G. (2007) · 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2007.4408931 · Cited by 438
Self-citationInteractive segmentation of image volumes with Live Surface
Armstrong, C. J., Price, B. L., & Barrett, W. A. (2007) · Computers & Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.cag.2006.11.015 · Cited by 53
Cited by
Wang, T.-C., Liu, M.-Y., Zhu, J.-Y., Liu, G., Tao, A., Kautz, J., & Catanzaro, B. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.06601 · Cited by 594
Online Adaptation of Convolutional Neural Networks for Video Object Segmentation
Voigtlaender, P., & Leibe, B. (2017) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2017 · doi:10.5244/c.31.116 · Cited by 443
Fast Video Object Segmentation by Reference-Guided Mask Propagation
Oh, S. W., Lee, J.-Y., Sunkavalli, K., & Kim, S. J. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00770 · Cited by 420
Jain, S. D., Xiong, B., & Grauman, K. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.228 · Cited by 361
Zhang, D., Javed, O., & Shah, M. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.87 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Bai, X., Wang, J., Simons, D., & Sapiro, G.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Graphics
- Published
- 2009-07-27
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7368
- OpenAlex
- W1975862670
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 48.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Video SnapCut: robust video object cutout using localized classifiers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1531326.1531376
- The paper
- Bai, X., Wang, J., Simons, D., & Sapiro, G. (2009). Video SnapCut: robust video object cutout using localized classifiers. ACM Transactions on Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1145/1531326.1531376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.