The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graph construction and b -matching for semi-supervised learning
Abstract
Graph based semi-supervised learning (SSL) methods play an increasingly important role in practical machine learning systems. A crucial step in graph based SSL methods is the conversion of data into a weighted graph. However, most of the SSL literature focuses on developing label inference algorithms without extensively studying the graph building method and its effect on performance. This article provides an empirical study of leading semi-supervised methods under a wide range of graph construction algorithms. These SSL inference algorithms include the Local and Global Consistency (LGC) method, the Gaussian Random Field (GRF) method, the Graph Transduction via Alternating Minimization (GTAM) method as well as other techniques. Several approaches for graph construction, sparsification and weighting are explored including the popular k-nearest neighbors method (kNN) and the b-matching method. As opposed to the greedily constructed kNN graph, the b-matched graph ensures each node in the graph has the same number of edges and produces a balanced or regular graph. Experimental results on both artificial data and real benchmark datasets indicate that b-matching produces more robust graphs and therefore provides significantly better prediction accuracy without any significant change in computation time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction by Locally Linear Embedding
Roweis, S. T., & Saul, L. K. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2323 · Cited by 14,965
Chung, F. (1996) · CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics · doi:10.1090/cbms/092 · Cited by 5,524
(2006) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262033589.001.0001 · Cited by 4,280
Learning with Local and Global Consistency
Zhou, D., Bousquet, O., Lal, T. N., Weston, J., & Schölkopf, B. (2003) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 3,864
Semi-Supervised Learning Literature Survey
Zhu, X. (2005) · Cited by 3,844
Semi-supervised learning using Gaussian fields and harmonic functions
Zhu, X., Zoubin Ghahramani, A., & Lafferty, J. (2003) · Cited by 3,509
Edmonds, J. (1965) · Canadian Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.4153/cjm-1965-045-4 · Cited by 2,428
Zhang, J., Marszałek, M., Lazebnik, S., & Schmid, C. (2007) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-006-9794-4 · Cited by 1,923
Edmonds, J. (2009) · Classic Papers in Combinatorics · doi:10.1007/978-0-8176-4842-8_26 · Cited by 1,517
Learning from Labeled and Unlabeled Data using Graph Mincuts
Blum, A. L., & Chawla, S. (2018) · doi:10.1184/r1/6606860 · Cited by 928
Cited by
A survey on semi-supervised learning
van Engelen, J. E., & Hoos, H. H. (2020) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-019-05855-6 · Cited by 2,666
Discriminative Multimanifold Analysis for Face Recognition from a Single Training Sample per Person
Lu, J., Tan, Y.-P., & Wang, G. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.70 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Jebara, T., Wang, J., & Chang, S.-F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-06-14
- Pages
- 441-448
- OpenAlex
- W2141923507
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 16.45
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graph construction and b -matching for semi-supervised learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1553374.1553432
- The paper
- Jebara, T., Wang, J., & Chang, S.-F. (2009). Graph construction and b -matching for semi-supervised learning. Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning. https://doi.org/10.1145/1553374.1553432
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.