The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure preserving embedding
Abstract
Structure Preserving Embedding (SPE) is an algorithm for embedding graphs in Euclidean space such that the embedding is low-dimensional and preserves the global topological properties of the input graph. Topology is preserved if a connectivity algorithm, such as k-nearest neighbors, can easily recover the edges of the input graph from only the coordinates of the nodes after embedding. SPE is formulated as a semidefinite program that learns a low-rank kernel matrix constrained by a set of linear inequalities which captures the connectivity structure of the input graph. Traditional graph embedding algorithms do not preserve structure according to our definition, and thus the resulting visualizations can be misleading or less informative. SPE provides significant improvements in terms of visualization and lossless compression of graphs, outperforming popular methods such as spectral embedding and Laplacian eigen-maps. We find that many classical graphs and networks can be properly embedded using only a few dimensions. Furthermore, introducing structure preserving constraints into dimensionality reduction algorithms produces more accurate representations of high-dimensional data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. D., & Langford, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 · Cited by 13,585
The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog
Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005) · Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery · doi:10.1145/1134271.1134277 · Cited by 2,619
Cited by
Structural Deep Network Embedding
Wang, D., Cui, P., & Zhu, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939753 · Cited by 2,845
A Comprehensive Survey of Graph Embedding: Problems, Techniques, and Applications
Cai, H., Zheng, V. W., & Chang, K. C.-C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2807452 · Cited by 2,034
Graph embedding techniques, applications, and performance: A survey
Goyal, P., & Ferrara, E. (2018) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.03.022 · Cited by 1,801
Learning Deep Structure-Preserving Image-Text Embeddings
Wang, L., Li, Y., & Lazebnik, S. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.541 · Cited by 760
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaw, B., & Jebara, T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-06-14
- Pages
- 937-944
- OpenAlex
- W2084809122
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure preserving embedding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1553374.1553494
- The paper
- Shaw, B., & Jebara, T. (2009). Structure preserving embedding. Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning. https://doi.org/10.1145/1553374.1553494
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.