The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics
Abstract
Customer preferences for products are drifting over time. Product perception and popularity are constantly changing as new selection emerges. Similarly, customer inclinations are evolving, leading them to ever redefine their taste. Thus, modeling temporal dynamics should be a key when designing recommender systems or general customer preference models. However, this raises unique challenges. Within the eco-system intersecting multiple products and customers, many different characteristics are shifting simultaneously, while many of them influence each other and often those shifts are delicate and associated with a few data instances. This distinguishes the problem from concept drift explorations, where mostly a single concept is tracked. Classical time-window or instance-decay approaches cannot work, as they lose too much signal when discarding data instances. A more sensitive approach is required, which can make better distinctions between transient effects and long term patterns. The paradigm we offer is creating a model tracking the time changing behavior throughout the life span of the data. This allows us to exploit the relevant components of all data instances, while discarding only what is modeled as being irrelevant. Accordingly, we revamp two leading collaborative filtering recommendation approaches. Evaluation is made on a large movie rating dataset by Netflix. Results are encouraging and better than those previously reported on this dataset.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372071 · Cited by 9,135
Restricted Boltzmann machines for collaborative filtering
Salakhutdinov, R., Mnih, A., & Hinton, G. (2007) · Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning · doi:10.1145/1273496.1273596 · Cited by 1,885
Cited by
Circle-based recommendation in online social networks
Yang, X., Steck, H., & Liu, Y. (2012) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2339530.2339728 · Cited by 346
Context relevance assessment and exploitation in mobile recommender systems
Baltrunas, L., Ludwig, B., Peer, S., & Ricci, F. (2012) · Personal and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1007/s00779-011-0417-x · Cited by 261
A Random Walk around the City: New Venue Recommendation in Location-Based Social Networks
Noulas, A., Scellato, S., Lathia, N., & Mascolo, C. (2012) · 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing · doi:10.1109/socialcom-passat.2012.70 · Cited by 184
Modeling and predicting behavioral dynamics on the web
Radinsky, K., Svore, K., Dumais, S., Teevan, J., Bocharov, A., & Horvitz, E. (2012) · Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2187836.2187918 · Cited by 122
Automated Product Recommendations with Preference-Based Explanations
Marchand, A., & Marx, P. (2020) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2020.01.001 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Koren, Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-06-28
- Pages
- 447-456
- OpenAlex
- W2080320419
- Cited by
- 1,203
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 49.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1557019.1557072
- The paper
- Koren, Y. (2009). Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/1557019.1557072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.