Web toolkits accessibility study
Abstract
Access to increasing number of web applications is very good news especially for disabled people. These applications become richer and offer wide variety of services used in everyday's life (document creation, instant messaging, data storage, email communication, social networking, etc.). The problem is that at the same time these rich internet applications (RIA) become less accessible. There is a Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) 2 related to W3C 1 which is trying to cope with this problem. In particular the Accessible Rich Internet Application suite of W3C (WAI-ARIA) 3 is describing how to improve the accessibility of dynamic web content and advanced user interface controls in rich internet applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Despite extensive research, guidelines, and laws, blind users still face Web accessibility and usability challenges.
“In spite of much extant research, guidelines and laws, web accessibility and usability challenges for the blind remain (Hailpern et al., 2009;Mikovec et al., 2009).”
From Understanding Blind Users' Web Accessibility and Usability Problems (2010) · cites this paper as Mikovec et al., 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Blind Users' Web Accessibility and Usability Problems
The University of North Carolina - Greensboro, Babu, R., Singh, R., The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, U., Ganesh, J., & Limited, I. T. (2010) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00015 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mikovec, Z., Vystrcil, J., & Slavik, P.
- Affiliations
- Czech Technical University in Prague
- Venue
- ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing
- Published
- 2009-06
- Issue
- 94
- Pages
- 3-8
- ISSN
- 1558-1187 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2337
- OpenAlex
- W2093781642
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Applications and Data Management
- Keywords
- web accessibility, rich internet applications, WAI-ARIA, Web Accessibility Initiative, assistive technology, disabled users, dynamic web content, user interface controls
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
