The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Graph-based mining of multiple object usage patterns
Abstract
The interplay of multiple objects in object-oriented programming often follows specific protocols, for example certain orders of method calls and/or control structure constraints among them that are parts of the intended object usages. Unfortunately, the information is not always documented. That creates long learning curve, and importantly, leads to subtle problems due to the misuse of objects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1145/1287624.1287630 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1040305.1040314 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/503272.503275 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1287624.1287632 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TSE.2008.24 · DOI
- 10.1007/11531142_23 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-540-24851-4_21 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1188895.1188910 · doi:10.1145/1188895.1188910
- 10.5555/381473.381509 · doi:10.5555/381473.381509 · Paper page
- 10.1145/502034.502041 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1453101.1453150 · DOI
- 10.1145/1081706.1081713 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1052883.1052895 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1181775.1181781 · DOI
- T. Kremenek , P. Twohey , G. Back , A. Ng , and D. Engler . From uncertainty to belief: inferring the specification within . OSDI'06 . T. Kremenek, P. Twohey, G. Back, A. Ng, and D. Engler. From uncertainty to belief: inferring the specification within. OSDI'06.
- 10.5555/832308.837142 · doi:10.5555/832308.837142
- 10.1109/TSE.2006.28 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1081706.1081755 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ASE.2006.63 · doi:10.1109/ase.2006.63
- 10.1145/1081706.1081754 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1065010.1065018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/337180.337200 · doi:10.1145/337180.337200
- 10.1007/978-3-642-00593-0_31 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSE.2007.63 · doi:10.1109/icse.2007.63
- 10.1002/jgt.3190010410 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1167473.1167508 · DOI
- 10.1145/1273463.1273487 · DOI
- 10.1145/1321631.1321663 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-540-31980-1_30 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TSE.2005.63 · DOI
- 10.1145/1137983.1137997 · DOI
- 10.1145/1134285.1134325 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
(2014) · doi:10.1145/2635868.2635901 · Cited by 159
Deep learning similarities from different representations of source code
Tufano, M., Watson, C., Bavota, G., Di Penta, M., White, M., & Poshyvanyk, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories · doi:10.1145/3196398.3196431 · Cited by 158
Enabling Data-Driven API Design with Community Usage Data: A Need-Finding Study
Zhang, T., Hartmann, B., Kim, M., & Glassman, E. L. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376382 · Cited by 25
A Theory of Robust API Knowledge
Thayer, K., Chasins, S. E., & Ko, A. J. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3444945 · Cited by 25
MARBLE: Mining for Boilerplate Code to Identify API Usability Problems
Nam, D., Horvath, A., Macvean, A., Myers, B., & Vasilescu, B. (2019) · 2019 34th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase.2019.00063 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, H. A., Pham, N. H., Al-Kofahi, J. M., & Nguyen, T. N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 7th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on The foundations of software engineering
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-08-24
- Pages
- 383-392
- OpenAlex
- W2059215200
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.45
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
