The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Subtopic structuring for full-length document access
Open accessAbstract
We argue that the advent of large volumes of full-length text, as opposed to short texts like abstracts and newswire, should be accompanied by corresponding new approaches to information access. Toward this end, we discuss the merits of imposing structure on full-length text documents; that is, a partition of the text into coherent multi-paragraph units that represent the pattern of subtopics that comprise the text. Using this structure, we can make a distinction between the main topics, which occur throughout the length of the text, and the subtopics, which are of only limited extent. We discuss why recognition of subtopic structure is important and how, to some degree of accuracy, it can be found. We describe a new way of specifying queries on full-length documents and then describe an experiment in which making use of the recognition of local structure achieves better results on a typical information retrieval task than does a standard IR measure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Test Collection Based Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems
Sanderson, M. (2010) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000009 · Cited by 485
LifeLogging: Personal Big Data
Gurrin, C., Smeaton, A. F., & Doherty, A. R. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000033 · Cited by 434
Fast generation of abstracts from general domain text corpora by extracting relevant sentences
Zechner, K. (1996) · Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics - · doi:10.3115/993268.993338 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Hearst, M. A., & Plaunt, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 16th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR '93
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1993
- Pages
- 59-68
- OpenAlex
- W2064579132
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subtopic structuring for full-length document access. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/160688.160695
- The paper
- Hearst, M. A., & Plaunt, C. (1993). Subtopic structuring for full-length document access. Proceedings of the 16th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR '93. https://doi.org/10.1145/160688.160695
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.