The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
Abstract
It is our great pleasure to welcome you to Victoria, British Columbia for UIST 2009, the Twenty-Second Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. UIST is the premier forum for the presentation of research innovations in the software and technology of human-computer interfaces. Sponsored by ACM's special interest groups on computer-human interaction (SIGCHI) and computer graphics (SIGGRAPH), UIST brings together researchers and practitioners from many areas, including web and graphical interfaces, new input and output devices, information visualization, interactive displays, tangible computing and CSCW. The single track schedule, intimate size and comfortable surroundings make UIST an ideal place to exchange results as well as forge future collaborations. The call for papers attracted 183 full paper and tech note submissions from more than 20 countries. The program committee accepted 33 papers (18%) after a thorough review process. Each anonymous submission (a first for UIST 2009) was assigned primary and secondary program committee members. The primary committee member assigned at least two external reviewers for each submission and the secondary at least one. After receiving the reviews, both program committee members wrote a meta-review for every submission. Authors were then given all reviews and the opportunity to write a short rebuttal. The program committee then met in New York on June 5-6, 2009, to examine each submission and select the top papers.…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kubo, Y., Koguchi, Y., Shizuki, B., Takahashi, S. I., & Hilliges, O. (2019) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI) · doi:10.1145/3338286.3340147 · Cited by 36
TouchMover 2.0 - 3D touchscreen with force feedback and haptic texture
Sinclair, M., Pahud, M., & Benko, H. (2014) · IEEE Haptics Symposium · doi:10.1109/haptics.2014.6775425 · Cited by 28
CHAIN: Developing model-driven contextual help for adaptive user interfaces
Akiki, P. A. (2017) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2017.10.017 · Cited by 19
Li, Q., Yang, Y., Yao, G., Wei, F., Li, R., Zhu, M., & Hou, H. (2024) · Case Studies in Construction Materials · doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e04051 · Cited by 16
Designing motion marking menus for people with visual impairments
Dim, N. K., Kim, K., & Ren, X. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.09.002 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-10-04
- OpenAlex
- W4241314462
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Keywords
- user interface software, human-machine interaction, web interface, graphical user interface, input/output devices, information visualization, interactive displays, tangible computing, computer-supported cooperative work
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review