The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incomplete Information in Relational Databases
Open accessAbstract
This paper concerns the semantics of Codd's relational model of data.Formulated are precise conditions that should be satisfied m a semantically meaningful extension of the usual relational operators, such as projection, selection, union, and join, from operators on relations to operators on tables with "null values" of various kinds allowed.These conditions require that the system be safe in the sense that no incorrect conclusion is derivable by usmg a specified subset [l of the relational operators; and that it be complete in the sense that all valid conclusions expressible by relational expressions using operators in fl are in fact derivable in this system.Two such systems of practical interest are shown.The first, based on the usual Codd's null values, supports projection and selection.The second, based on many different ("marked") null values or variables allowed to appear in a table, ~s shown to correctly support projection, posmve selection (with no negation occurring in the selection condition), union, and renaming of attributes, which allows for processing arbitrary conjunctive queries.A very desirable property enjoyed by this system is that all relational t~perators on tables are performed in exactly the same way as in the case of the usual relations.A third system, mainly of theoretical interest, supporting projection, selection, union, join, and renaming, is also discussed.Under a so-called closed world assumption, it can also handle the operator of difference.It is based on a device called a condiUonal table and is crucial to the proof of the correctness of the second system.All systems considered allow for relational expressions contaming arbitrardy many different relation symbols, and no form of the universal relation assumption is required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A relational model of data for large shared data banks
Codd, E. F. (1970) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/362384.362685 · Cited by 5,547
Cited by
Green, T. J., Karvounarakis, G., & Tannen, V. (2007) · Proceedings of the twenty-sixth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems · doi:10.1145/1265530.1265535 · Cited by 812
A survey on provenance: What for? What form? What from?
Herschel, M., Diestelkämper, R., & Ben Lahmar, H. (2017) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-017-0486-1 · Cited by 300
SQL’s Three-Valued Logic and Certain Answers
Libkin, L. (2016) · ACM Transactions on Database Systems · doi:10.1145/2877206 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Imieliński, T., & Lipski, W.
- Venue
- Journal of the ACM
- Published
- 1984-09-20
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 761-791
- ISSN
- 0004-5411 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-735X
- OpenAlex
- W1990391007
- Cited by
- 1,013
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incomplete Information in Relational Databases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1634.1886
- The paper
- Imieliński, T., & Lipski, W. (1984). Incomplete Information in Relational Databases. Journal of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1634.1886
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.