Latent dirichlet allocation for tag recommendation
Abstract
Tagging systems have become major infrastructures on the Web. They allow users to create tags that annotate and categorize content and share them with other users, very helpful in particular for searching multimedia content. However, as tagging is not constrained by a controlled vocabulary and annotation guidelines, tags tend to be noisy and sparse. Especially new resources annotated by only a few users have often rather idiosyncratic tags that do not reflect a common perspective useful for search. In this paper we introduce an approach based on Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) for recommending tags of resources in order to improve search. Resources annotated by many users and thus equipped with a fairly stable and complete tag set are used to elicit latent topics to which new resources with only a few tags are mapped. Based on this, other tags belonging to a topic can be recommended for the new resource. Our evaluation shows that the approach achieves significantly better precision and recall than the use of association rules, suggested in previous work, and also recommends more specific tags. Moreover, extending resources with these recommended tags significantly improves search for new resources.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A sustainability threshold was manually set at 10% such that startups with websites having at least 10% of text dedicated to one of the relevant topics were counted as sustainability startups.
“After a reading of the websites with the highest proportions of text corresponding to each sustainability topic was conducted, a sustainability threshold was manually set at 10% (Krestel et al., 2009) such that all startups with websites having at least 10% of their text dedicated to one of the relevant topics were subsequently counted as sustainability startups.”
From Sustainability startups and where to find them: Investigating the share of sustainability startups across entrepreneurial ecosystems and the causal drivers of differences (2021) · cites this paper as Krestel et al., 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sequences of purchases in credit card data reveal lifestyles in urban populations
Di Clemente, R., Luengo-Oroz, M., Travizano, M., Xu, S., Vaitla, B., & González, M. C. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05690-8 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Tiba, S., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127054 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
- Authors
- Krestel, R., Fankhauser, P., & Nejdl, W.
- Affiliations
- L3S Research Center (DE)
- L3S Research Center, Hannover, Germany
- Venue
- Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-10-23
- Pages
- 61-68
- OpenAlex
- W2031237011
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 21.40
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Academy of Finland
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
- Keywords
- tag recommendation, tagging systems, latent Dirichlet allocation, topic modeling, association rule mining
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review