Scripting practices in complex systems management
Abstract
System administrators are end-users too. And as end-users, they develop tools, create web pages, write command-line scripts, use spreadsheets, and repurpose existing tools. In short, they engage in end-user programming activities in support of their systems management work. We examined system administrator practices in software tool development, operations, and maintenance based on ethnographic field studies at service delivery centers and data centers across the United States. Our findings suggest that software practices were mostly informal and collaborative and mixed within formal change processes; tool development and debugging were interleaved with tool use and maintenance as they interacted with live systems; and the complexity of large-scale systems and the risks involved in changing live and critical systems put increased demands on system administrators. We argue that system administrators might benefit from certain software engineering methodologies such as agile software development and software modeling.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scripts can be written to create users in bulk, set up home directories, assign groups, and enforce password policies.
“Scripts can be written to create users in bulk, set up their home directories, assign groups, and enforce password policies (like expiration dates or complexity rules) (Kandogan et al., 2009).”
From Modern Approaches to Unix Automation: Shell Scripting, Configuration Management, and Security (2025) · cites this paper as Kandogan et al., 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modern Approaches to Unix Automation: Shell Scripting, Configuration Management, and Security
Madamanchi, S. R. (2025) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2025.72773 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kandogan, E., Maglio, P. P., Haber, E. M., & Bailey, J. H.
- Affiliations
- IBM (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Human Interaction for the Management of Information Technology
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-11-07
- Pages
- 9-18
- OpenAlex
- W2079493531
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computer Human Interaction for Management of Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Spreadsheets and End-User Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Keywords
- system administrators, end-user programming, system management, software tool development, tool maintenance, debugging, data centers, agile software development, software modeling, large-scale systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review