The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Collection tree protocol
Abstract
This paper presents and evaluates two principles for wireless routing protocols. The first is datapath validation: data traffic quickly discovers and fixes routing inconsistencies. The second is adaptive beaconing: extending the Trickle algorithm to routing control traffic reduces route repair latency and sends fewer beacons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wireless Sensor Networks for Healthcare
Ko, J., Lu, C., Srivastava, M. B., Stankovic, J. A., Terzis, A., & Welsh, M. (2010) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2010.2065210 · Cited by 733
A Survey on Sensor-Cloud: Architecture, Applications, and Approaches
Alamri, A., Ansari, W. S., Hassan, M. M., Hossain, M. S., Alelaiwi, A., & Hossain, M. A. (2013) · International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks · doi:10.1155/2013/917923 · Cited by 398
Ghaleb, B., Al-Dubai, A. Y., Ekonomou, E., Alsarhan, A., Nasser, Y., Mackenzie, L. M., & Boukerche, A. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2874356 · Cited by 333
SDN and Virtualization Solutions for the Internet of Things: A Survey
Bizanis, N., & Kuipers, F. A. (2016) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2016.2607786 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Gnawali, O., Fonseca, R., Jamieson, K., Moss, D., & Levis, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-11-04
- Pages
- 1-14
- OpenAlex
- W2160343401
- Cited by
- 1,404
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 112.82
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collection tree protocol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1644038.1644040
- The paper
- Gnawali, O., Fonseca, R., Jamieson, K., Moss, D., & Levis, P. (2009). Collection tree protocol. Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1644038.1644040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
