The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factor in the neighbors: Scalable and accurate collaborative filtering
Abstract
Recommender systems provide users with personalized suggestions for products or services. These systems often rely on collaborating filtering (CF), where past transactions are analyzed in order to establish connections between users and products. The most common approach to CF is based on neighborhood models, which originate from similarities between products or users. In this work we introduce a new neighborhood model with an improved prediction accuracy. Unlike previous approaches that are based on heuristic similarities, we model neighborhood relations by minimizing a global cost function. Further accuracy improvements are achieved by extending the model to exploit both explicit and implicit feedback by the users. Past models were limited by the need to compute all pairwise similarities between items or users, which grow quadratically with input size. In particular, this limitation vastly complicates adopting user similarity models, due to the typical large number of users. Our new model solves these limitations by factoring the neighborhood model, thus making both item-item and user-user implementations scale linearly with the size of the data. The methods are tested on the Netflix data, with encouraging results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372071 · Cited by 9,135
Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering
Linden, G., Smith, B., & York, J. (2003) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2003.1167344 · Cited by 5,403
Restricted Boltzmann machines for collaborative filtering
Salakhutdinov, R., Mnih, A., & Hinton, G. (2007) · Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning · doi:10.1145/1273496.1273596 · Cited by 1,885
Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2000) · Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work · doi:10.1145/358916.358995 · Cited by 1,731
Cited by
A Survey of Recommendation Systems: Recommendation Models, Techniques, and Application Fields
Ko, H., Lee, S., Park, Y., & Choi, A. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11010141 · Cited by 658
Guo, G., Zhang, J., & Yorke-Smith, N. (2015) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9153 · Cited by 573
Using the internet of things in smart energy systems and networks
Ahmad, T., & Zhang, D. (2021) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102783 · Cited by 332
Advances in Collaborative Filtering
Koren, Y., Rendle, S., & Bell, R. (2022) · Recommender Systems Handbook · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4_3 · Cited by 324
Self-citationA new similarity measure using Bhattacharyya coefficient for collaborative filtering in sparse data
Patra, B. K., Launonen, R., Ollikainen, V., & Nandi, S. (2015) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.03.001 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Koren, Y.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 1556-4681 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-472X
- OpenAlex
- W2047109571
- Cited by
- 718
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 119.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factor in the neighbors: Scalable and accurate collaborative filtering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1644873.1644874
- The paper
- Koren, Y. (2010). Factor in the neighbors: Scalable and accurate collaborative filtering. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data. https://doi.org/10.1145/1644873.1644874
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.