The DOI matches its Crossref record.
End-to-end packet delay and loss behavior in the internet
Open accessAbstract
We use the measured round trip delays of small UDP probe packets sent at regular time intervals to analyze the end-to-end packet delay and loss behavior in the Internet. By varying the interval between probe packets, it is possible to study the structure of the Internet load over different time scales. In this paper, the time scales of interest range from a few milliseconds to a few minutes. Our observations agree with results obtained by others using simulation and experimental approaches. For example, our estimates of Internet workload are consistent with the hypothesis of a mix of bulk traffic with larger packet size, and interactive traffic with smaller packet size. We observe compression (or clustering) of the probe packets, rapid fluctuations of queueing delays over small intervals, etc. Our results also show interesting and less expected behavior. For example, we find that the losses of probe packets are essentially random unless the probe traffic uses a large fraction of the available bandwidth. We discuss the implications of these results on the design of control mechanisms for the Internet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
On the constancy of internet path properties
Zhang, Y., & Duffield, N. (2001) · Proceedings of the First ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet Measurement - IMW '01 · doi:10.1145/505202.505228 · Cited by 466
Reliability in wireless sensor networks: A survey and challenges ahead
Mahmood, M. A., Seah, W. K. G., & Welch, I. (2015) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2014.12.016 · Cited by 342
Timing Attacks in Low-Latency Mix Systems
Levine, B. N., Reiter, M. K., Wang, C., & Wright, M. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-27809-2_25 · Cited by 277
Timely and Continuous Machine-Learning-Based Classification for Interactive IP Traffic
Nguyen, T. T. T., Armitage, G., Branch, P., & Zander, S. (2012) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/tnet.2012.2187305 · Cited by 156
Mac-layer packet loss models for wi-fi networks: A survey
Silva, C. A. G. D., & Pedroso, C. M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2958260 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolot, J.-C.
- Venue
- Conference proceedings on Communications architectures, protocols and applications
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1993-10
- Pages
- 289-298
- OpenAlex
- W2069499077
- Cited by
- 729
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: End-to-end packet delay and loss behavior in the internet. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/166237.166265
- The paper
- Bolot, J.-C. (1993). End-to-end packet delay and loss behavior in the internet. Conference proceedings on Communications architectures, protocols and applications. https://doi.org/10.1145/166237.166265
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.