The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Random oracles are practical: a paradigm for designing efficient protocols
Open accessAbstract
We argue that the random oracle model—where all parties have access to a public random oracle—provides a bridge between cryptographic theory and cryptographic practice. In the paradigm we suggest, a practical protocol P is produced by first devising and proving correct a protocol PR for the random oracle model, and then replacing oracle accesses by the computation of an “appropriately chosen” function h. This paradigm yields protocols much more efficient than standard ones while retaining many of the advantages of provable security. We illustrate these gains for problems including encryption, signatures, and zero-knowledge proofs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems
Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L. (1978) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359340.359342 · Cited by 13,462
Cited by
Handbook of applied cryptography
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-4512 · Cited by 10,357
Public-Key Cryptosystems Based on Composite Degree Residuosity Classes
Paillier, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48910-x_16 · Cited by 7,250
Ciphertext-Policy Attribute-Based Encryption
Bethencourt, J., Sahai, A., & Waters, B. (2007) · 2007 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP '07) · doi:10.1109/sp.2007.11 · Cited by 5,131
Douceur, J. R. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45748-8_24 · Cited by 4,419
Efficient Selective-ID Secure Identity-Based Encryption Without Random Oracles
Boneh, D., & Boyen, X. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24676-3_14 · Cited by 1,766
Metadata
- Authors
- Bellare, M., & Rogaway, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Computer and communications security - CCS '93
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1993
- Pages
- 62-73
- ISSN
- 1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052267638
- Cited by
- 4,712
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.16
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Random oracles are practical: a paradigm for designing efficient protocols. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/168588.168596
- The paper
- Bellare, M., & Rogaway, P. (1993). Random oracles are practical: a paradigm for designing efficient protocols. Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Computer and communications security - CCS '93. https://doi.org/10.1145/168588.168596
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.