The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Learning influence probabilities in social networks
Abstract
Recently, there has been tremendous interest in the phenomenon of influence propagation in social networks. The studies in this area assume they have as input to their problems a social graph with edges labeled with probabilities of influence between users. However, the question of where these probabilities come from or how they can be computed from real social network data has been largely ignored until now. Thus it is interesting to ask whether from a social graph and a log of actions by its users, one can build models of influence. This is the main problem attacked in this paper. In addition to proposing models and algorithms for learning the model parameters and for testing the learned models to make predictions, we also develop techniques for predicting the time by which a user may be expected to perform an action. We validate our ideas and techniques using the Flickr data set consisting of a social graph with 1.3M nodes, 40M edges, and an action log consisting of 35M tuples referring to 300K distinct actions. Beyond showing that there is genuine influence happening in a real social network, we show that our techniques have excellent prediction performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy
Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, K. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14033 · Cited by 3,022
“A second issue is the variety of ways that influence has been defined (Watts 2007; Goyal, Bonchi, and Lakshmanan 2010).”
BackgroundThe role of social networks in information diffusion
Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012) · Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2187836.2187907 · Cited by 1,526
Influence Maximization on Social Graphs: A Survey
Li, Y., Fan, J., Wang, Y., & Tan, K.-L. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2807843 · Cited by 659
Social Media Mining: An Introduction
Zafarani, R., Abbasi, M. A., & Liu, H. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139088510 · Cited by 592
Influence and Passivity in Social Media
Romero, D. M., Galuba, W., Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23808-6_2 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Goyal, A., Bonchi, F., & Lakshmanan, L. V. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2010-02-04
- Pages
- 241-250
- OpenAlex
- W2073926352
- Cited by
- 1,022
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.76
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning influence probabilities in social networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1718487.1718518
- The paper
- Goyal, A., Bonchi, F., & Lakshmanan, L. V. S. (2010). Learning influence probabilities in social networks. Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718487.1718518
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.