The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Context-aware citation recommendation
Abstract
When you write papers, how many times do you want to make some citations at a place but you are not sure which papers to cite? Do you wish to have a recommendation system which can recommend a small number of good candidates for every place that you want to make some citations? In this paper, we present our initiative of building a context-aware citation recommendation system. High quality citation recommendation is challenging: not only should the citations recommended be relevant to the paper under composition, but also should match the local contexts of the places citations are made. Moreover, it is far from trivial to model how the topic of the whole paper and the contexts of the citation places should affect the selection and ranking of citations. To tackle the problem, we develop a context-aware approach. The core idea is to design a novel non-parametric probabilistic model which can measure the context-based relevance between a citation context and a document. Our approach can recommend citations for a context effectively. Moreover, it can recommend a set of citations for a paper with high quality. We implement a prototype system in CiteSeerX. An extensive empirical evaluation in the CiteSeerX digital library against many baselines demonstrates the effectiveness and the scalability of our approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases
Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., & Swami, A. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/170035.170072 · Cited by 14,907
Maximum-likelihood estimation of the density matrix
Banaszek, K., D’Ariano, G. M., Paris, M. G. A., & Sacchi, M. F. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.010304 · Cited by 342
Cited by
A Survey of Recommendation Systems: Recommendation Models, Techniques, and Application Fields
Ko, H., Lee, S., Park, Y., & Choi, A. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11010141 · Cited by 658
S2ORC: The Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus
Lo, K., Wang, L. L., Neumann, M., Kinney, R., & Weld, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.447 · Cited by 457
Xia, F., Wang, W., Bekele, T. M., & Liu, H. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2016.2641460 · Cited by 266
Content‐based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis
Ding, Y., Zhang, G., Chambers, T., Song, M., Wang, X., & Zhai, C. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23256 · Cited by 252
A context-aware citation recommendation model with BERT and graph convolutional networks
Jeong, C., Jang, S., Park, E., & Choi, S. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03561-y · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- He, Q., Pei, J., Kifer, D., Mitra, P., & Giles, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2010-04-26
- Pages
- 421-430
- OpenAlex
- W2146936057
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Context-aware citation recommendation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1772690.1772734
- The paper
- He, Q., Pei, J., Kifer, D., Mitra, P., & Giles, L. (2010). Context-aware citation recommendation. Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772734
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.