The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Benchmarking cloud serving systems with YCSB
Abstract
While the use of MapReduce systems (such as Hadoop) for large scale data analysis has been widely recognized and studied, we have recently seen an explosion in the number of systems developed for cloud data serving. These newer systems address "cloud OLTP" applications, though they typically do not support ACID transactions. Examples of systems proposed for cloud serving use include BigTable, PNUTS, Cassandra, HBase, Azure, CouchDB, SimpleDB, Voldemort, and many others. Further, they are being applied to a diverse range of applications that differ considerably from traditional (e.g., TPC-C like) serving workloads. The number of emerging cloud serving systems and the wide range of proposed applications, coupled with a lack of apples-to-apples performance comparisons, makes it difficult to understand the tradeoffs between systems and the workloads for which they are suited. We present the "Yahoo! Cloud Serving Benchmark" (YCSB) framework, with the goal of facilitating performance comparisons of the new generation of cloud data serving systems. We define a core set of benchmarks and report results for four widely used systems: Cassandra, HBase, Yahoo!'s PNUTS, and a simple sharded MySQL implementation. We also hope to foster the development of additional cloud benchmark suites that represent other classes of applications by making our benchmark tool available via open source. In this regard, a key feature of the YCSB framework/tool is that it is extensible--it supports easy definition of new workloads, in addition to making it easy to benchmark new systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2007) · doi:10.1145/1294261.1294281 · Cited by 3,447
Cited by
Toward Scalable Systems for Big Data Analytics: A Technology Tutorial
Hu, H., Wen, Y., Chua, T.-S., & Li, X. (2014) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2014.2332453 · Cited by 1,099
Tsai, C.-W., Lai, C.-F., Chao, H.-C., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2015) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-015-0030-3 · Cited by 818
SCONE: secure Linux containers with Intel SGX
(2016) · Operating Systems Design and Implementation · doi:10.5555/3026877.3026930 · Cited by 582
Challenges and opportunities in edge computing
Varghese, B., Wang, N., Barbhuiya, S., Kilpatrick, P., & Nikolopoulos, D. S. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Conference on Smart Cloud (SmartCloud) · doi:10.1109/smartcloud.2016.18 · Cited by 565
Security, Performance, and Applications of Smart Contracts: A Systematic Survey
Rouhani, S., & Deters, R. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2911031 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, B. F., Silberstein, A., Tam, E., Ramakrishnan, R., & Sears, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1st ACM symposium on Cloud computing
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2010-06-10
- Pages
- 143-154
- OpenAlex
- W1985229168
- Cited by
- 3,716
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 88.60
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benchmarking cloud serving systems with YCSB. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1807128.1807152
- The paper
- Cooper, B. F., Silberstein, A., Tam, E., Ramakrishnan, R., & Sears, R. (2010). Benchmarking cloud serving systems with YCSB. Proceedings of the 1st ACM symposium on Cloud computing. https://doi.org/10.1145/1807128.1807152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.