The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GreenGPS: a participatory sensing fuel-efficient maps application
Abstract
This paper develops a navigation service, called GreenGPS, that uses participatory sensing data to map fuel consumption on city streets, allowing drivers to find the most fuel efficient routes for their vehicles between arbitrary end-points. The service exploits measurements of vehicular fuel consumption sensors, available via the OBD-II interface standardized in all vehicles sold in the US since 1996. The interface gives access to most gauges and engine instrumentation. The most fuel-efficient route does not always coincide with the shortest or fastest routes, and may be a function of vehicle type. Our experimental study shows that a participatory sensing system can influence routing decisions of individual users and also answers two questions related to the viability of the new service. First, can it survive conditions of sparse deployment? Second, how much fuel can it save? A challenge in participatory sensing is to generalize from sparse sampling of high-dimensional spaces to produce compact descriptions of complex phenomena. We illustrate this by developing models that can predict fuel consumption of a set of sixteen different cars on the streets of the city of Urbana-Champaign. We provide experimental results from data collection suggesting that a 1% average prediction error is attainable and that an average 10% savings in fuel can be achieved by choosing the right route.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection
Kohavi, R. (1995) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19712698 · Cited by 10,909
Cited by
When things matter: A survey on data-centric internet of things
Qin, Y., Sheng, Q. Z., Falkner, N. J. G., Dustdar, S., Wang, H., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2016) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2015.12.016 · Cited by 331
SignalGuru: leveraging mobile phones for collaborative traffic signal schedule advisory
Koukoumidis, E., Peh, L.-S., & Martonosi, M. R. (2011) · Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services · doi:10.1145/1999995.2000008 · Cited by 316
Known unknowns: Indirect energy effects of information and communication technology
Horner, N. C., Shehabi, A., & Azevedo, I. L. (2016) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/10/103001 · Cited by 177
Survey of Real-time Processing Technologies of IoT Data Streams
Yasumoto, K., Yamaguchi, H., & Shigeno, H. (2016) · Journal of Information Processing · doi:10.2197/ipsjjip.24.195 · Cited by 139
Understanding Human-Machine Networks: A Cross-Disciplinary Survey
Tsvetkova, M., Yasseri, T., Meyer, E. T., Pickering, J. B., Engen, V., Walland, P., Lüders, M., Følstad, A., & Bravos, G. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3039868 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Ganti, R. K., Pham, N., Ahmadi, H., Nangia, S., & Abdelzaher, T. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2010-06-15
- Pages
- 151-164
- OpenAlex
- W2171157447
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.38
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GreenGPS: a participatory sensing fuel-efficient maps application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1814433.1814450
- The paper
- Ganti, R. K., Pham, N., Ahmadi, H., Nangia, S., & Abdelzaher, T. F. (2010). GreenGPS: a participatory sensing fuel-efficient maps application. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. https://doi.org/10.1145/1814433.1814450
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.