Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anatomizing application performance differences on smartphones

Huang, Junxian, Xu, Qiang, Tiwana, Birjodh, Mao, Z. Morley, Zhang, Ming, Bahl, Paramvir·2010·Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services

Abstract

The use of cellular data networks is increasingly popular due to the widespread deployment of 3G technologies and the rapid adoption of smartphones, such as iPhone and GPhone. Besides email and web browsing, a variety of network applications are now available, rendering smartphones potentially useful substitutes for their desktop counterparts. Nevertheless, the performance of smartphone applications in the wild is still poorly understood due to a lack of systematic measurement methodology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1814433.1814452

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Huang, J., Xu, Q., Tiwana, B., Mao, Z. M., Zhang, M., & Bahl, P.
Venue
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services
Publisher
ACM
Published
2010-06-15
Pages
165-178
OpenAlex
W2080165082
Cited by
296
References
0
FWCI
27.88
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anatomizing application performance differences on smartphones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1814433.1814452
The paper
Huang, J., Xu, Q., Tiwana, B., Mao, Z. M., Zhang, M., & Bahl, P. (2010). Anatomizing application performance differences on smartphones. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. https://doi.org/10.1145/1814433.1814452

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.