The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An example-based mapping method for text categorization and retrieval
Open accessAbstract
A unified model for text categorization and text retrieval is introduced. We use a training set of manually categorized documents to learn word-category associations, and use these associations to predict the categories of arbitrary documents. Similarly, we use a training set of queries and their related documents to obtain empirical associations between query words and indexing terms of documents, and use these associations to predict the related documents of arbitrary queries. A Linear Least Squares Fit (LLSF) technique is employed to estimate the likelihood of these associations. Document collections from the MEDLINE database and Mayo patient records are used for studies on the effectiveness of our approach, and on how much the effectiveness depends on the choices of training data, indexing language, word-weighting scheme, and morphological canonicalization. Alternative methods are also tested on these data collections for comparison. It is evident that the LLSF approach uses the relevance information effectively within human decisions of categorization and retrieval, and achieves a semantic mapping of free texts to their representations in an indexing language. Such a semantic mapping lead to a significant improvement in categorization and retrieval, compared to alternative approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Solving Least Squares Problems
Lawson, C. L., & Hanson, R. J. (1995) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971217 · Cited by 7,103
Cited by
Mining query logs: turning search usage data into knowledge
Silvestri, F. (2009) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000013 · Cited by 194
Automatic text classification to support systematic reviews in medicine
García Adeva, J. J., Pikatza Atxa, J. M., Ubeda Carrillo, M., & Ansuategi Zengotitabengoa, E. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.047 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Y., & Chute, C. G.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Information Systems
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 252-277
- ISSN
- 1046-8188 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2868
- OpenAlex
- W1986913017
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An example-based mapping method for text categorization and retrieval. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/183422.183424
- The paper
- Yang, Y., & Chute, C. G. (1994). An example-based mapping method for text categorization and retrieval. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/183422.183424
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.