The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Temporal diversity in recommender systems
Abstract
Collaborative Filtering (CF) algorithms, used to build web-based recommender systems, are often evaluated in terms of how accurately they predict user ratings. However, current evaluation techniques disregard the fact that users continue to rate items over time: the temporal characteristics of the system's top-N recommendations are not investigated. In particular, there is no means of measuring the extent that the same items are being recommended to users over and over again. In this work, we show that temporal diversity is an important facet of recommender systems, by showing how CF data changes over time and performing a user survey. We then evaluate three CF algorithms from the point of view of the diversity in the sequence of recommendation lists they produce over time. We examine how a number of characteristics of user rating patterns (including profile size and time between rating) affect diversity. We then propose and evaluate set methods that maximise temporal recommendation diversity without extensively penalising accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems
Vargas, S., & Castells, P. (2011) · Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems · doi:10.1145/2043932.2043955 · Cited by 709
Kaminskas, M., & Bridge, D. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/2926720 · Cited by 465
Time-aware recommender systems: a comprehensive survey and analysis of existing evaluation protocols
Campos, P. G., Díez, F., & Cantador, I. (2014) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-012-9136-x · Cited by 437
News recommender systems – Survey and roads ahead
Karimi, M., Jannach, D., & Jugovac, M. (2018) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2018.04.008 · Cited by 336
Diversity in Big Data: A Review
Drosou, M., Jagadish, H. V., Pitoura, E., & Stoyanovich, J. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0054 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Lathia, N., Hailes, S., Capra, L., & Amatriain, X.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2010-07-19
- Pages
- 210-217
- OpenAlex
- W2159155347
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.49
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal diversity in recommender systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1835449.1835486
- The paper
- Lathia, N., Hailes, S., Capra, L., & Amatriain, X. (2010). Temporal diversity in recommender systems. Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1145/1835449.1835486
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.