Cited by 19Usability and User Interface DesignInteractive and Immersive DisplaysInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces

·2010

Abstract

The AVI conferences started here, in Rome on 1992, and were held every two years since then. The broad area of HCI has been expanding due to the fact that more persons wanted/needed to use computers, personal (one for each person) and now public as in Ambient Intelligence applications where the computing chips are integrated with the environment. In all applications on computing systems, the essential, wanted working feature, is how to make interaction simple both when learning it and using it so as to find the best way to interact with it. It is here that the interface plays a fundamental role and our conferences have suggested modeling, implementing and evaluating different suggested designs. Starting from the users, their habits and expectations and ending (or even redesigning) after usability testing. Many different cultures are brought together in this process: computer scientists, information architects, psychologists and semiologists: they are all involved since the background knowledge of users (technical, artistic, humanistic, etc) plays an important role in understanding (and remembering), how to use a computer application. The variety of new technological interaction devices like mouse, track pad, joystick, eye follower and the importance of the user recognizing the working mode he/she is in are all different aspects of one complex situation in which new programs are offered every day to be deployed to achieve significant tasks from word processing to using smart m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1842993

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results are consistent with prior research emphasising the importance of linguistic simplification and contextualisation for making legal or technical standards actionable for novice users.

    “These results are consistent with prior research emphasising the importance of linguistic simplification and contextualisation for making legal or technical standards actionable for novice users [12, 27].”
  • Scaffolding strategies that frame both the 'how' and the 'why' of accessibility are advocated by pattern-based or example-driven approaches.

    “This reinforces the case for scaffolding strategies that frame both the 'how' and the 'why' of accessibility, as advocated by pattern-based or example-driven approaches [12].”

Publisher
ACM
Published
2010-05-26
OpenAlex
W4249496387
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
visual interface, human-computer interaction, interface design, usability evaluation, ambient intelligence, interaction devices, eye tracking, haptic interface, speech recognition, user-centered design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review