Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces
Abstract
The AVI conferences started here, in Rome on 1992, and were held every two years since then. The broad area of HCI has been expanding due to the fact that more persons wanted/needed to use computers, personal (one for each person) and now public as in Ambient Intelligence applications where the computing chips are integrated with the environment. In all applications on computing systems, the essential, wanted working feature, is how to make interaction simple both when learning it and using it so as to find the best way to interact with it. It is here that the interface plays a fundamental role and our conferences have suggested modeling, implementing and evaluating different suggested designs. Starting from the users, their habits and expectations and ending (or even redesigning) after usability testing. Many different cultures are brought together in this process: computer scientists, information architects, psychologists and semiologists: they are all involved since the background knowledge of users (technical, artistic, humanistic, etc) plays an important role in understanding (and remembering), how to use a computer application. The variety of new technological interaction devices like mouse, track pad, joystick, eye follower and the importance of the user recognizing the working mode he/she is in are all different aspects of one complex situation in which new programs are offered every day to be deployed to achieve significant tasks from word processing to using smart m…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The results are consistent with prior research emphasising the importance of linguistic simplification and contextualisation for making legal or technical standards actionable for novice users.
“These results are consistent with prior research emphasising the importance of linguistic simplification and contextualisation for making legal or technical standards actionable for novice users [12, 27].”
From Proceedings of the 37th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
Scaffolding strategies that frame both the 'how' and the 'why' of accessibility are advocated by pattern-based or example-driven approaches.
“This reinforces the case for scaffolding strategies that frame both the 'how' and the 'why' of accessibility, as advocated by pattern-based or example-driven approaches [12].”
From Proceedings of the 37th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Household food waste: drivers and potential intervention points for design – an extensive review
Hebrok, M., & Boks, C. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.069 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2010-05-26
- OpenAlex
- W4249496387
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- visual interface, human-computer interaction, interface design, usability evaluation, ambient intelligence, interaction devices, eye tracking, haptic interface, speech recognition, user-centered design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review