CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 60Innovative Human-Technology InteractionFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsUsability and User Interface Design

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Designing for dynamic family structures: divorced families and interactive systems

Odom, William, Zimmerman, John, Forlizzi, Jodi·2010·Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
DOI 10.1145/1858171.1858199
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

While the HCI community has long investigated issues of designing for family and the home, very little attention has focused on the lives of divorced families and the ways in which interactive systems might be better designed to address the very real and growing issues they face. In this paper we present an overview of related research on divorce and families. We then report field evidence from 13 in depth interviews conducted with families of parents and children in joint custody situations, and unpack key emergent problems and tensions. We conclude with a discussion of the design implications and opportunities that give shape to how the HCI community may be able to have a positive effect on this set of potential users. The overarching goal of this research is to better understand how the HCI community might begin to approach designing for this alternative family.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1858171.1858199

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Echo Show supported online information search, enabling participants to collect, organise and comprehend information primarily about day-to-day health and care.

    “the Echo Show also supported online information search; the ability for our participants to collect, organise and comprehend information, primarily about their day to day health and care, retrieved using digital tools (e.g. the web) [59]”

    From Amazon Echo Show as a Multimodal Human-to-Human Care Support Tool within Self-Isolating Older UK Households (2022) · cites this paper as [59]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1037/0893-3200.15.3.355 · DOI
  2. Amato P. R., 2004, Parenting Through Family Transitions, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 23, 31
  3. 10.1145/1718918.1718946 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/585074 · DOI
  5. 10.5555/1771592.1771613 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/cd.23219967408 · DOI
  7. Chawla L., 1992, Place Attachment. Altman, I., Low, S. (ed)
  8. Csikszenthmihalyi M. Rochberg-Halton E. (1981). The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge University Press Cambridge. Csikszenthmihalyi M. Rochberg-Halton E. (1981). The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self . Cambridge University Press Cambridge. · DOI
  9. 10.1007/11853565_2 · DOI
  10. 10.1145/1753326.1753699 · DOI
  11. 10.5555/1671011.1671013 · DOI
  12. 10.1145/1460563.1460666 · DOI
  13. Fitzpatrick M Vangelisti A. (Eds.) (1995). Explaining Family Interactions. Sage Publications: London. Fitzpatrick M Vangelisti A. (Eds.) (1995). Explaining Family Interactions . Sage Publications: London. · DOI
  14. Frissen V. A. Icts in the Rush Hour of Life. The Information Society 16 (March 1999) 65--75. Frissen V. A. Icts in the Rush Hour of Life. The Information Society 16 (March 1999) 65--75. · DOI
  15. 10.1145/1357054.1357184 · DOI
  16. Ito M. et al. (2010). Hanging Out Messing Around Geeking out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media. MIT Press. Ito M. et al. (2010). Hanging Out Messing Around Geeking out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media . MIT Press.
  17. 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00190.x · DOI
  18. 10.1145/1013115.1013128 · DOI
  19. 10.1145/1125451.1125635 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.08.007 · DOI
  21. Livingstone S., 2010, City
  22. 10.1145/1124772.1124903 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1997.00183.x · DOI
  24. 10.1145/1502800.1502806 · DOI
  25. 10.1145/1520340.1520394 · DOI
  26. 10.1145/1753326.1753601 · DOI
  27. 10.1145/1753326.1753712 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8 · DOI
  29. 10.1145/1054972.1055058 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/BF01537056 · DOI
  31. 10.1145/1394445.1394473 · DOI
  32. 10.1145/1054972.1055060 · DOI
  33. US Department of Health and Human Services. (March 26 1999). Press Release: HHS LAUNCHES "BE THEIR DAD" PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY CAMPAIGN. US Department of Health and Human Services. (March 26 1999). Press Release: HHS LAUNCHES "BE THEIR DAD" PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY CAMPAIGN.
  34. 10.1145/1254960.1254984 · DOI
  35. 10.1145/1394445.1394480 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.09.005 · DOI
  37. 10.1145/1518701.1518765 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Odom, W., Zimmerman, J., & Forlizzi, J.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2010-08-16
Pages
151-160
DOI
10.1145/1858171.1858199
OpenAlex
W1984024156
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.91
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)
Locations
Designing Interactive Systems Conference (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
divorce, joint custody, divorced families, home computing, interactive system design, children of divorce, family dynamics, design implications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review