The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Indoor localization without the pain
Abstract
While WiFi-based indoor localization is attractive, the need for a significant degree of pre-deployment effort is a key challenge. In this paper, we ask the question: can we perform indoor localization with no pre-deployment effort? Our setting is an indoor space, such as an office building or a mall, with WiFi coverage but where we do not assume knowledge of the physical layout, including the placement of the APs. Users carrying WiFi-enabled devices such as smartphones traverse this space in normal course. The mobile devices record Received Signal Strength (RSS) measurements corresponding to APs in their view at various (unknown) locations and report these to a localization server. Occasionally, a mobile device will also obtain and report a location fix, say by obtaining a GPS lock at the entrance or near a window. The centerpiece of our work is the EZ Localization algorithm, which runs on the localization server. The key intuition is that all of the observations reported to the server, even the many from unknown locations, are constrained by the physics of wireless propagation. EZ models these constraints and then uses a genetic algorithm to solve them. The results from our deployment in two different buildings are promising. Despite the absence of any explicit pre-deployment calibration, EZ yields a median localization error of 2m and 7m, respectively, in a small building and a large building, which is only somewhat worse than the 0.7m and 4m yielded by the best-performing but calibrationintensive Horus scheme [29] from prior work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system
Bahl, P., & Padmanabhan, V. N. (2002) · Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064) · doi:10.1109/infcom.2000.832252 · Cited by 8,380
Self-citationThe Horus WLAN location determination system
Youssef, M., & Agrawala, A. (2005) · Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services · doi:10.1145/1067170.1067193 · Cited by 1,653
Cited by
Wi-Fi Fingerprint-Based Indoor Positioning: Recent Advances and Comparisons
He, S., & Chan, S.-H. G. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2464084 · Cited by 1,355
Recent Advances in Indoor Localization: A Survey on Theoretical Approaches and Applications
Yassin, A., Nasser, Y., Awad, M., Al-Dubai, A., Liu, R., Yuen, C., Raulefs, R., & Aboutanios, E. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2632427 · Cited by 916
Torres-Sospedra, J., Montoliu, R., Martinez-Uso, A., Avariento, J. P., Arnau, T. J., Benedito-Bordonau, M., & Huerta, J. (2014) · 2014 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN) · doi:10.1109/ipin.2014.7275492 · Cited by 615
Dude, where's my card?: RFID positioning that works with multipath and non-line of sight
Wang, J., & Katabi, D. (2013) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2013 conference on SIGCOMM · doi:10.1145/2486001.2486029 · Cited by 482
Wireless Sensing for Human Activity: A Survey
Liu, J., Liu, H., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, C. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2934489 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Chintalapudi, K., Padmanabha Iyer, A., & Padmanabhan, V. N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the sixteenth annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2010-09-20
- Pages
- 173-184
- OpenAlex
- W2170240475
- Cited by
- 962
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 64.20
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indoor localization without the pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1859995.1860016
- The paper
- Chintalapudi, K., Padmanabha Iyer, A., & Padmanabhan, V. N. (2010). Indoor localization without the pain. Proceedings of the sixteenth annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. https://doi.org/10.1145/1859995.1860016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.