Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

AccessMiner: using system-centric models for malware protection

Lanzi, Andrea, Balzarotti, Davide, Kruegel, Christopher, Christodorescu, Mihai, Kirda, Engin·2010·Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer and communications security

Abstract

Models based on system calls are a popular and common approach to characterize the run-time behavior of programs. For example, system calls are used by intrusion detection systems to detect software exploits. As another example, policies based on system calls are used to sandbox applications or to enforce access control. Given that malware represents a significant security threat for today's computing infrastructure, it is not surprising that system calls were also proposed to distinguish between benign processes and malicious code.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1866307.1866353

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Lanzi, A., Balzarotti, D., Kruegel, C., Christodorescu, M., & Kirda, E.
Venue
Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer and communications security
Publisher
ACM
Published
2010-10-04
Pages
399-412
ISSN
1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125743503
Cited by
177
References
0
FWCI
12.50
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AccessMiner: using system-centric models for malware protection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1866307.1866353
The paper
Lanzi, A., Balzarotti, D., Kruegel, C., Christodorescu, M., & Kirda, E. (2010). AccessMiner: using system-centric models for malware protection. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. https://doi.org/10.1145/1866307.1866353

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.