Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using the past to score the present: extending term weighting models through revision history analysis

Aji, Ablimit, Wang, Yu, Agichtein, Eugene, Gabrilovich, Evgeniy·2010·Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management

Abstract

The generative process underlies many information retrieval models, notably statistical language models. Yet these models only examine one (current) version of the document, effectively ignoring the actual document generation process. We posit that a considerable amount of information is encoded in the document authoring process, and this information is complementary to the word occurrence statistics upon which most modern retrieval models are based. We propose a new term weighting model, Revision History Analysis (RHA), which uses the revision history of a document (e.g., the edit history of a page in Wikipedia) to redefine term frequency - a key indicator of document topic/relevance for many retrieval models and text processing tasks. We then apply RHA to document ranking by extending two state-of-the-art text retrieval models, namely, BM25 and the generative statistical language model (LM). To the best of our knowledge, our paper is the first attempt to directly incorporate document authoring history into retrieval models. Empirical results show that RHA provides consistent improvements for state-of-the-art retrieval models, using standard retrieval tasks and benchmarks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1871437.1871519

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1145/1148170.1148177 · DOI
  2. J. Allan . Introduction to topic detection and tracking . In Topic detection and tracking: event-based information organization , pages 1 -- 16 . Kluwer Academic Publishers , 2002 . J. Allan. Introduction to topic detection and tracking. In Topic detection and tracking: event-based information organization, pages 1--16. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. · DOI
  3. 10.1145/1390334.1390419 · DOI
  4. 10.1145/1367497.1367561 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/1367497.1367505 · DOI
  6. 10.1145/1008992.1009000 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/1076034.1076086 · DOI
  8. 10.5555/1855138.1855147 · DOI
  9. 10.1145/1390334.1390394 · DOI
  10. 10.1145/1718487.1718489 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1145/125187.125189 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/978-3-540-85902-4_1 · DOI
  13. 10.1145/988672.988738 · DOI
  14. 10.1145/988672.988739 · DOI
  15. D. Hawking , N. Craswell , and P. Thistlewaite . Overview of TREC-7 very large collection track . In TREC-7 , 1998 . D. Hawking, N. Craswell, and P. Thistlewaite. Overview of TREC-7 very large collection track. In TREC-7, 1998.
  16. 10.1145/1645953.1646008 · DOI
  17. J. Kamps , S. Geva , and A. Trotman . Analysis of the inex 2009 ad hoc track results . In INEX , 2009 . J. Kamps, S. Geva, and A. Trotman. Analysis of the inex 2009 ad hoc track results. In INEX, 2009.
  18. 10.1145/775152.775233 · DOI
  19. 10.1145/1008992.1009027 · DOI
  20. 10.1145/383952.383970 · DOI
  21. 10.1145/1571941.1572023 · DOI
  22. 10.1145/1008992.1009026 · DOI
  23. 10.1145/860435.860463 · DOI
  24. 10.1145/1367497.1367557 · DOI
  25. S. Robertson , S. Walker , S. Jones , M. M. Hancock-Beaulieu , and M. Gatford . Okapi at TREC-3 . In Proc. 3rd TREC , pages 109 -- 126 , 1994 . S. Robertson, S. Walker, S. Jones, M. M. Hancock-Beaulieu, and M. Gatford. Okapi at TREC-3. In Proc. 3rd TREC, pages 109--126, 1994.
  26. 10.1145/1031171.1031181 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s00778-007-0072-z · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.ipm.2003.10.003 · DOI
  29. 10.1145/1390334.1390407 · DOI
  30. 10.1145/1148170.1148204 · DOI
  31. 10.1145/1242572.1242628 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aji, A., Wang, Y., Agichtein, E., & Gabrilovich, E.
Affiliations
  • Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
  • Yahoo! Research, Santa Clara, CA, USA
Venue
Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
Publisher
ACM
Published
2010-10-26
Pages
629-638
Cited by
24
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review