The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects and Interactions of Data Quality and Problem Complexity on Classification
Abstract
Data quality remains a persistent problem in practice and a challenge for research. In this study we focus on the four dimensions of data quality noted as the most important to information consumers, namely accuracy, completeness, consistency, and timeliness. These dimensions are of particular concern for operational systems, and most importantly for data warehouses, which are often used as the primary data source for analyses such as classification, a general type of data mining. However, the definitions and conceptual models of these dimensions have not been collectively considered with respect to data mining in general or classification in particular. Nor have they been considered for problem complexity. Conversely, these four dimensions of data quality have only been indirectly addressed by data mining research. Using definitions and constructs of data quality dimensions, our research evaluates the effects of both data quality and problem complexity on generated data and tests the results in a real-world case. Six different classification outcomes selected from the spectrum of classification algorithms show that data quality and problem complexity have significant main and interaction effects. From the findings of significant effects, the economics of higher data quality are evaluated for a frequent application of classification and illustrated by the real-world case.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Another dominant topic is completeness to which the ML community almost exclusively refers to as missing data119,125–128,133–135,182.”
From The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [133]
Citations
Cites
AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment
Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., & Wang, R. Y. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(02)00043-5 · Cited by 1,611
Anchoring Data Quality Dimensions in Ontological Foundations
Wand, Y., & Wang, R. Y. (1996) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/240455.240479 · Cited by 1,479
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1016/j.asoc.2004.12.002 · DOI
- 10.1145/545151.545178 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.44.4.462 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.31.2.150 · DOI
- 10.1109/TKDE.2003.1161595 · DOI
- Davenport , T. H. and Harris , J. G . 2007 . Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning . Harvard Business School Publishing Company , Boston, MA . Davenport, T. H. and Harris, J. G. 2007. Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning. Harvard Business School Publishing Company, Boston, MA.
- 10.1109/64.180410 · DOI
- 10.1504/IJIQ.2007.013374 · DOI
- 10.1145/1659225.1659228 · DOI
- Fisher , C. , Lauria , E. , and Matheus , C . 2007. In search of an accuracy metric . In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Quality. Fisher, C., Lauria, E., and Matheus, C. 2007. In search of an accuracy metric. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Quality.
- Ge , M. and Helfert , M . 2006. A framework to assess decision quality using information quality dimensions . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality. Ge, M. and Helfert, M. 2006. A framework to assess decision quality using information quality dimensions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality.
- Gomes , P. , Farinha , J. , and Trigueiros , M. J . 2007. A data quality metamodel extension to CWM . In Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modeling. 17--26 . Gomes, P., Farinha, J., and Trigueiros, M. J. 2007. A data quality metamodel extension to CWM. In Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modeling. 17--26.
- 10.1016/j.cor.2005.11.007 · DOI
- 10.1145/1515693.1515697 · DOI
- 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00094-8 · DOI
- 10.1145/505248.506007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.stamet.2005.08.005 · DOI
- 10.2307/249418 · DOI
- 10.1145/545151.545177 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1008334909089 · DOI
- 10.4018/jdm.2004010104 · DOI
- Lee Y. W. Pipino L. L. Funk J. D. and Wang R. Y. 2006. Journey to Data Quality. The MIT Press. Lee Y. W. Pipino L. L. Funk J. D. and Wang R. Y. 2006. Journey to Data Quality . The MIT Press. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.029 · DOI · Paper page
- Oates , T. and Jensen , D . 1997. The effects of training set size on decision tree complexity . In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 254--262 . Oates, T. and Jensen, D. 1997. The effects of training set size on decision tree complexity. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 254--262.
- 10.1016/j.dss.2007.06.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dss.2005.12.005 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0237 · DOI
- 10.1145/505248.506010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1022643204877 · DOI · Paper page
- Redman , T. C. 2004 . Data: An unfolding quality disaster. DM Rev. 6. Redman, T. C. 2004. Data: An unfolding quality disaster. DM Rev. 6.
- Reichheld , F. F. and Sasser , W. E. 1990 . Zero defections . Harvard Bus. Rev. 68 , 105 -- 111 . Reichheld, F. F. and Sasser, W. E. 1990. Zero defections. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68, 105--111.
- Sessions , V. and Valtorta , M . 2006. Learning Bayesian networks from inaccurate data . In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Quality. Sessions, V. and Valtorta, M. 2006. Learning Bayesian networks from inaccurate data. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Quality.
- 10.1016/j.2004.12.006 · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.2000.2941 · DOI
- 10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.06.004 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10462-004-0751-8 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hazen, B. T., Boone, C. A., Ezell, J. D., & Jones-Farmer, L. A. (2014) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.04.018 · Cited by 863
The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: A systematic review
Schwabe, D., Becker, K., Seyferth, M., Klaß, A., & Schaeffter, T. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01196-4 · Cited by 169
Data Quality: Setting Organizational Policies
Storey, V. C., Dewan, R. M., & Freimer, M. (2012) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.004 · Cited by 31
Using Trust as a Measure to Derive Data Quality in Data Shared IoT Deployments
Byabazaire, J., O'Hare, G., & Delaney, D. (2020) · 2020 29th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN) · doi:10.1109/icccn49398.2020.9209633 · Cited by 28
Kuo, T.-C., Peng, C.-Y., & Kuo, C.-J. (2024) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2021.1969348 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Blake, R., & Mangiameli, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
- University of Rhode Island (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Data and Information Quality
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-28
- ISSN
- 1936-1955 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-1963
- OpenAlex
- W2021668370
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 12.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Data and Information Quality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Quality and Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- data quality, problem complexity, classification, data quality dimensions, accuracy, completeness, consistency, timeliness, data mining, data warehouse, machine learning classifiers, interaction effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects and Interactions of Data Quality and Problem Complexity on Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1891879.1891881
- The paper
- Blake, R., & Mangiameli, P. (2011). The Effects and Interactions of Data Quality and Problem Complexity on Classification. Journal of Data and Information Quality. https://doi.org/10.1145/1891879.1891881