The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Image and video upscaling from local self-examples
Abstract
We propose a new high-quality and efficient single-image upscaling technique that extends existing example-based super-resolution frameworks. In our approach we do not rely on an external example database or use the whole input image as a source for example patches. Instead, we follow a local self-similarity assumption on natural images and extract patches from extremely localized regions in the input image. This allows us to reduce considerably the nearest-patch search time without compromising quality in most images. Tests, that we perform and report, show that the local self-similarity assumption holds better for small scaling factors where there are more example patches of greater relevance. We implement these small scalings using dedicated novel nondyadic filter banks, that we derive based on principles that model the upscaling process. Moreover, the new filters are nearly biorthogonal and hence produce high-resolution images that are highly consistent with the input image without solving implicit back-projection equations. The local and explicit nature of our algorithm makes it simple, efficient, and allows a trivial parallel implementation on a GPU. We demonstrate the new method ability to produce high-quality resolution enhancement, its application to video sequences with no algorithmic modification, and its efficiency to perform real-time enhancement of low-resolution video standard into recent high-definition formats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Super-resolution from a single image
Glasner, D., Bagon, S., & Irani, M. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459271 · Cited by 1,889
Cited by
Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution
Johnson, J., Alahi, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46475-6_43 · Cited by 11,283
Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networks
Dong, C., Loy, C. C., He, K., & Tang, X. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2439281 · Cited by 10,105
Ultra-Resolving Face Images by Discriminative Generative Networks
Yu, X., & Porikli, F. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46454-1_20 · Cited by 308
Deep Network Cascade for Image Super-resolution
Cui, Z., Chang, H., Shan, S., Zhong, B., & Chen, X. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_4 · Cited by 255
Accurate Blur Models vs. Image Priors in Single Image Super-resolution
Efrat, N., Glasner, D., Apartsin, A., Nadler, B., & Levin, A. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2013.352 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Freedman, G., & Fattal, R.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Graphics
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7368
- OpenAlex
- W1976416062
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Image and video upscaling from local self-examples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1944846.1944852
- The paper
- Freedman, G., & Fattal, R. (2011). Image and video upscaling from local self-examples. ACM Transactions on Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1145/1944846.1944852
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.