The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids
Abstract
A power grid is a complex system connecting electric power generators to consumers through power transmission and distribution networks across a large geographical area. System monitoring is necessary to ensure the reliable operation of power grids, and state estimation is used in system monitoring to best estimate the power grid state through analysis of meter measurements and power system models. Various techniques have been developed to detect and identify bad measurements, including interacting bad measurements introduced by arbitrary, nonrandom causes. At first glance, it seems that these techniques can also defeat malicious measurements injected by attackers. In this article, we expose an unknown vulnerability of existing bad measurement detection algorithms by presenting and analyzing a new class of attacks, called false data injection attacks , against state estimation in electric power grids. Under the assumption that the attacker can access the current power system configuration information and manipulate the measurements of meters at physically protected locations such as substations, such attacks can introduce arbitrary errors into certain state variables without being detected by existing algorithms. Moreover, we look at two scenarios, where the attacker is either constrained to specific meters or limited in the resources required to compromise meters. We show that the attacker can systematically and efficiently construct attack vectors in both scenarios to change the results of state estimation in arbitrary ways. We also extend these attacks to generalized false data injection attacks , which can further increase the impact by exploiting measurement errors typically tolerated in state estimation. We demonstrate the success of these attacks through simulation using IEEE test systems, and also discuss the practicality of these attacks and the real-world constraints that limit their effectiveness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra
Meyer, C. (2000) · doi:10.1137/1.9780898719512 · Cited by 3,565
Cited by
The 2015 Ukraine Blackout: Implications for False Data Injection Attacks
Liang, G., Weller, S. R., Zhao, J., Luo, F., & Dong, Z. Y. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2016.2631891 · Cited by 1,248
Cyber–Physical System Security for the Electric Power Grid
Sridhar, S., Hahn, A., & Govindarasu, M. (2012) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2011.2165269 · Cited by 1,208
Cyber-Physical Systems Security—A Survey
Humayed, A., Lin, J., Li, F., & Luo, B. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2703172 · Cited by 1,185
A Survey on Industrial Internet of Things: A Cyber-Physical Systems Perspective
Xu, H., Yu, W., Griffith, D., & Golmie, N. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2884906 · Cited by 637
A survey of physics-based attack detection in cyber-physical systems
Giraldo, J., Urbina, D., Cardenas, A., Valente, J., Faisal, M., Ruths, J., Tippenhauer, N. O., Sandberg, H., & Candell, R. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3203245 · Cited by 535
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Ning, P., & Reiter, M. K.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Information and System Security
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-33
- ISSN
- 1094-9224 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7406
- OpenAlex
- W2038651258
- Cited by
- 2,428
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 72.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1952982.1952995
- The paper
- Liu, Y., Ning, P., & Reiter, M. K. (2011). False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/1952982.1952995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.